Paul
Goble
Staunton, December 25 – Vladimir Putin’s
suggestion last week that the hijab has “no place” in “traditional [Russian]
Islam” is not only incorrect but “idiotic,” a Muslim commentator says, because
it will lead to the further “radicalization” of the umma rather than its
further integration into the Russian community.
At his press conference, the Russian
president said that “in our culture – and when I say ‘in ours’ I have in mind
our traditional Islam, there are no hijabs.” Further, he observed that Islamic
authorities abroad say there is no need for them and asked rhetorically “why
should we introduce alien traditions? Why?” (www.interfax-religion.ru/islam/?act=news&div=49356).
Reacting to this statement, Anastasiya Fatima
Yezhova, an ethnic Russian Muslim, says that Putin’s words about the traditional
female head scarf are “idiotic” from the word go. “Traditional Islam, whether Russian,
Indonesian or Egyptian, considers the hijab obligatory.” The Koran and the
Sunna are very clear on that point (www.mesoeurasia.org/archives/12335).
Implying that the hijab is a threat
to national security, as Putin’s words appear to do, she continues, entails the
danger that this may become a self-fulfilling prophecy, one in which such
attitudes will “radicalize Muslims” and make them into “a threat not to the
security of Russia but to the security of the regime.”
That is because, after Putin’s
comment, every cop and every official of United Russia “and every petty chief
will consider it his Holy Duty Before the Motherland to suppress any young girl
who wears a hijab: to put her on a list, to prohibit her actions, to expel her [from
one or another institution], and finally to put her in jail.”
Putin’s words and Yezhova’s reaction
come on the heels of the much hyped cased of a school director in Stavropol
kray who banned hijabs and whose actions led to expressions of support for the
re-introduction of standard uniforms for school children there and across the
Russsian Federation (kavpolit.com/xvatit-kopatsya-v-bele-musulman/).
But
both the one and the other caused some Muslim leaders to seek to find a middle
way, one that would satisfy the demands of their faith without enflaming public
or official opinion in the Russian Federation about the hijab or other Islamic
customs and by extension about the umma more generally.
According
to an article in “Vzglyad,” Moscow Mufti Albir Krganov, the chairman of the
Muslim Spiritual Adminsitration (MSD) of Chuvashia, the problem has been blown
out of proportion. While Islam does
require the hijab for adult women, it does not impose a similar requirement on
younger girls. They can wear scarves as Orthodox girls do (www.vz.ru/news/2012/12/20/613032.html).
Krganov noted that “the hijab and
the Muslim scarf are different things and that Putin spoke [only] about hijabs.”
Consequently, the mufti continued, neither Muslims nor non-Muslims should “politicize”
this issue. Instead, they should find common ground in a common school uniform—with
scarves for girls.
Farid Asadullin, the deputy head of
the Muslim Spiritual Directorate (MSD) of the European Part of Russia, agreed.
Wearing head coverings, he said, is “a tradition which is rooted both among
Orthodox women and among Muslims” and for both it is “a symbol of moral
behavior.”
“Wearing a hijab or a Muslim scarf
is thus a reflection of the fulnessof faith to which any religious tradition
strives be it Orthodox, Islamic or Jewish … This in principle is the norm which
has been adopted in Muslim society from time out of mind.” It is no threat to
anyone who understands the nature of faith.
No comments:
Post a Comment