Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 10 – Russian public
opinion “is being prepared for a change in Kremlin policy” toward Ukraine,
Moscow commentators say, with central government media now downplaying the need
for and utility of force and playing up the ways in which Vladimir Putin can
serve as “peacemaker.”
But this shift in tone, which
reflects increasing popular skepticism about Moscow’s approach to Ukraine and
elite fears about sanctions and international isolation, does not represent a
change in strategy as a shift in tactics because the Moscow media continue to
attack Ukraine and Putin equally clearly wants to weaken Kyiv and re-subordinate
it to Moscow.
Instead of continuing to set the
stage for Russian intervention, an article in yesterday’s “Nezavisimaya gazeta”
says, state-controlled media and especially television have shifted the tone
and even content of their coverage of events in Ukraine and thus reinforced
Russian fears that the situation might be headed “out of control” (ng.ru/politics/2014-07-09/1_ukraina.html).
Thus, the widely-reported poll
numbers showing that two-thirds of Russians are now against military
intervention are the product not only of questions that would likely inevitably
arise in any conflict where an indefinite situation extends for some time but
also of Kremlin policy of shifting popular views.
According to the Moscow paper’s Aleksandra
Samarina, “the Kremlin is preparing the population for new approaches” by
reducing television coverage of victims in southeastern Ukraine and providing
more information showing that the pro-Russian forces there are not winning
quickly and easily as Russian media had projected earlier.
Lev Gudkov, head of the Levada Center polling
agency, says that Russian attitudes about Ukraine and the use of force are “really
changing.” Most Russians aren’t yet that
concerned about sanctions, but the most educated, informed and active are
worried about where things may be heading.
“People are concerned,” he says, “that
the situation in Ukraine is shifting out of control and they do not want to
bear responsibility for that,” something they fear could happen if Russian
forces were to cross into Ukraine overtly.
At the same time, the sociologist
notes, “the anti-Ukrainian campaign is continuing,” but he adds that “the wave
of euphoria is beginning little by little to decline and growing doubts,
skepticism, concern and troubled thoughts are appearing: should citizens have
to pay for all this?”
At the same time, Gudkov says, the
Kremlin itself is worried about new sanctions and is “preparing an exit
strategy,” one that will involve less a change in ultimate goals than in the
presentation of “Putin as peacemaker,” as someone who wants to prevent “a
humanitarian catastrophe.” That will
only add to his standing in the polls.
Nikolay Petrov, a Russian political
analyst, agrees. He says that the Kremlin now is proceeding more carefully, “lowering
the temperature of propaganda” in the hopes of avoiding a new round of
sanctions and preventing more Russians from asking themselves whether they want
to get involved in real fighting and not just a short triumphant march forward.
Putin is thus engaged in a
complicated balancing act, Petrov continues. On the one hand, he doesn’t want
greater confrontation with the West, but on the other, he doesn’t want to be
viewed by Russians as someone who sacrificed pro-Russian groups. Presenting himself as a peacemaker is thus a
way out.
And Gleb Pavlovsky, head of the
Effective Politics Foundation, says that this shift is creating cognitive
dissonance among Russians as they struggle to find their way between a rational
understanding of the risks of using force as compared to the uncertain benefits
and their desire as shown by earlier polls to play the role of a great power
that does what it wants.
Although none of the Russian
commentators draw this conclusion, it appears that Putin is attempting to
update Clausewitz, the German theorist who said “war is a continuation of
politics by other means.” In place of that, the Kremlin leader appears set to
try to demonstrate that “peacemaking can be a continuation of war by other
means” -- and a more successful one too.
No comments:
Post a Comment