Paul
Goble
Staunton, September 18 – Russia’s
Federal Migration Service says that there are now 12,000 refugees from Syria in
the Russian Federation, of whom 2,000 have received residence permits. There are far more people in Syria who would
like to come, including most prominently, the 100,000 Circassians, whose
ancestors Russian officials expelled 150 years ago.
Circassian
activists in the North Caucasus and their supporters both elsewhere in Russia
and internationally are calling on Moscow to take more of them in, but so far,
the Russian authorities have been blocked that flow fearful that it could
change the ethnic balance in the North Caucasus and threaten Russian control
there.
But as the war in Syria intensifies,
Russian involvement there deepens, and the refugee crisis in Europe expands,
the international community and the European Union in the first instance should
demand that Moscow open the gates for more of those fleeing violence in Syria,
including the Circassians.
A minuscule number of Syrians have
fled to Europe via Russia, Moscow and Scandinavian media have reported over the
last three weeks. (See kp.ru/daily/26432.7/3303299/
and thelocal.no/20150827/syrians-crossing-norway-border-on-bicyles.)
But most of the 12,000 who have come have done so only with Russian government
blessing.
Most Russian discussions on the
refugee issue have focused less on the needs of the refugees than on Moscow’s
insistence that Europe has only itself to blame for the crisis because it is
following the US lead in Syria and not supporting the Asad government. Indeed,
Moscow insists, the refugees are fleeing ISIS, not Asad (kp.ru/daily/26434.4/3305424/).
Yury Moskovsky, an advisor to Russia’s
Federal Migration Service, says that “Russia is prepared to accept flows of
Syrian migrants, but they are not coming to us.
According to him, the reasons are geographic: the Black Sea is rough,
and going through the Caucasus is not easy (nsn.fm/in-the-world/ig-zapolnyaet-v-evrope-vakuum-spravedlivosti-ispolzuya-evropeyskiy-krizis-neravenstva-.php).
There are some
7,000 Syrian citizens in Russia now, he continues, who might be a magnet; but
he adds that he does not think that many will come to Russia. Instead, they
will continue to head to the European Union countries, even though Russia could
take more in and even though Europe would like to block any further flows in
its direction.
But there is at least one group of
people in Syria who would be prime candidates to come to Russia as refugees, if
Moscow would permit it. Fred Weir of the
Christian Science Monitor provides the latest discussion as to why the Russian authorities
are unlikely to allow the Circassians to come (csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2015/0916/Russia-as-safe-zone-for-Syrian-refugees-It-s-not-as-odd-as-you-d-think).
He quotes Maksim Shevchenko, a journalist
and member of the Presidential Human Rights Council, who says that “so far
Russia makes it very hard for Muslim refugees to come.” The problem is not geography,
as Moskovsky says, but rather “a lot of bureaucratic obstacles.” And in the current situation, “this needs to
change” or some of these people will be killed.
Konstantin Kalachev, a Moscow political
analyst agrees. “Russia seems ready to digest large numbers of people,” as
shown by the handling of the Ukrainian refugees a year ago, “but politicians
are not ready to take responsibility … Russia only thinks about this issue in the
context of bigger politics.” And in this regard, no issue is bigger than that
of the Circassians.
In an act of genocide in 1864, Russian
officials expelled and thus sent to their deaths hundreds of thousands of
Circassians from the North Caucasus after the latter resisted Russian colonial
expansion for more than a century. Those
who survived prospered in the Ottoman Empire and its successors, including
Syria and Iraq.
But in recent years, faced with rising
nationalism and Islamism, many of the estimated five million Circassians in the
Middle East have expressed interest in returning to their homeland. If even a
portion of them did, that would change the ethnic balance in the North Caucasus
and likely undermine Russian control.
As a result, the Russian authorities have
done whatever they could to block almost all Circassians from returning. Moscow
has not given them the assistance they had a right to expect under the
compatriots program, and Russian officials have been anything but welcoming to
those few who have arrived home.
Since 2011, when Syria’s civil war began,
Weir reports, “about 1,000 Syrian Circassians have moved to the north Caucasus
republics of Karacheyevo-Cherkessia and Kabardino-Balkaria, where their
ancestral language is understood. But most report that they have received
little official help.”
“Many people here have been good to us,”
one of their number told the CSM journalist, “and we do feel wonderful to have
regained our homeland. But economically, it’s very hard. Many of our people
prefer to go to Europe, or America, though I would like to stay and make it
work for my family here.”
Shevchenko says that Russians “need to
change our views and become concerned about not only those who are Russian, or
married to Russians, and start helping more people,” adding that he expects that
to happen. But any movement by Moscow on the Circassian front seems unlikely.
Vladimir Putin and his regime are still
furious for the efforts of Circassians around the world to call attention to the
ugly fact that his 2014 Olympiad was held exactly at the site of the 1864
Circassian genocide, and consequently, neither nor other Russian officials
appear ready to help the Circassians of Syria.
The international community needs to take
note of this fact and to hold Russia accountable especially since Moscow
routinely claims it is engaged in humanitarian efforts – when the reality is
that its work in this area is highly selective and to date, the Circassians
have been very much excluded from any of its benefits.
No comments:
Post a Comment