Paul
Goble
Staunton, December 10 – Speaking at
a section of the Moscow Economic Forum yesterday, two Russian businessmen
issued stinging denunciations of the Russian government’s economic policies,
arguing that Moscow was killing the business it couldn’t steal from, and
demanded that the government be replaced.
Their protests reflect the anger
many Russian businessmen feel about Moscow policies but have been largely
unwilling to express. But now that two have broken this taboo, more businessmen
may speak out and thus present, along with the truckers’ strike, a more serious
threat to the regime than those activists who describe themselves as the
political opposition.
But there is another possibility as
well, one that cannot be discounted in the murky politics of Vladimir Putin’s
Russia: these sharp criticisms may be exploited by the Kremlin leader to
deflect all blame for shortcomings from himself to the government of Dmitry
Medvedev and then replace the latter with a new command.
One of the businessmen, Pavel
Grudinin, director of the Lenin State Farm, said that government policies were
responsible for the current economic crisis and that they were keeping businesses
from operating effectively (me-forum.ru/media/events/sektsiya-mef/
and rbc.ru/business/10/12/2015/5668b8429a7947618f7d161d).
The other, Dmitry Potapenko, the
managing partner of the management Development Group, went even further. He
said that the actions of the government, including “the criminal goods embargo,”
restrictions and new taxes and fees, had delivered “a knockout blow” to Russian
business.
Potapenko described the situation in
blunt terms: “The dialogue of business and the authorities over the last 20
years has been one of a butcher with a cow in which the former sweetly looks
into the eyes of the latter and holding a knife on its throat asks: ‘And what
do you have to give today – meat or milk’”
Both supported the long-haul truckers’
action and said that it was now clear that the government is incapable of
dealing with the crisis. “I do not understand,” Grudinin said, why the
government doesn’t go now as it is certainly going to have to go at some point
in the future if Russia is to recover.
Their criticism generalizes on what
others have said, including exiled businessman Igor Bitkov (windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2015/08/the-bitkov-case-dangerous-sign-of-times.html)
and most recently Sberbank head German Gref about the problems of business in
Russia rbc.ru/politics/02/10/2015/560e31299a79478eaa11fb94).
But what is most important is that the
two have blamed not the system in general but rather focused on the government
as such, thus politicizing the issue in a way that the Kremlin may have more
problems responding to, according to various commentators reacting to the words
of Grudinin and Potepenko (kasparov.ru/material.php?id=5669292352C38).
No comments:
Post a Comment