Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 29 – Some years ago,
before he became Estonian president, Toomas Hendrik Ilves observed that “if the
Russians come back again, they won’t be constrained by communism.” Instead, he
suggested, they will build a genuinely Russian empire in which Russians will
rule over non-Russians without even “the constraints” communism offered.
Those constraints, of course, were
never absolute and did not mean that non-Russians were protected from the
Russian majority or from the imperial pretensions of Moscow. But they did mean
that Soviet Russians had to operate in ways that at least appeared to suggest a
respect for the rights of other nations within the USSR.
Now, those from Vladimir Putin on
down who regret the end of the USSR and who would restore Moscow’s power over
much or even all of the former Soviet space are not so limited. Instead, they
want not a “Russia for the Russians” but a “Russian empire for the Russians,” an
entity that would inevitably threaten all non-Russians and the West as well.
It means that the empire such people
would restore would treat non-Russians within its borders as second class
citizens or worse and that they would only be able to maintain this ethnicized
empire by engaging in constant wars against outsiders, something that the
latter should reflect upon before dismissing what is happening in the post-Soviet
space as unimportant.
Those reflections are prompted by
the remarks yesterday of Vladimir Zhirinovsky, the flamboyant leader of the
misnamed Liberal Democratic Party of Russia who often serves as a bellwether of
the direction that those above him in Putin’s chekist state, are currently
moving even if they are unwilling to be as blunt and politically incorrect as
he is.
Speaking to a congress of the LDPR,
Zhirinovsky said that his party would take part in the upcoming Russian
parliamentary elections with the following slogans: “Arise, Great Russia,” “Stop
Denigrating Russians” and, most instructively of all, “Restore the borders of the
USSR” (interfax.ru/russia/515731).
As RFE/RL summarizes the LDPR leader’s
speech, Zhirinovsky said that such slogans captured the needs of “millions of
Russians” who have been “’driven out’” of Central Asia, the Caucasus, Ukraine
and the Baltic states” and also those who are oppressed by ethnocratic
republics inside the Russian Federation (svoboda.org/content/article/27825392.html).
The first, he suggested, must be
returned to Russian rule, and the second must be disbanded and replaced by
entities defined entirely by territory and not ethnicity – or at least not by
many ethnicity other than Russian.
Of course, it is easy to dismiss
Zhirinovsky’s words. He has achieved what success he has by being outrageous.
But all too often, his outrageousness has been reflected in subsequent Kremlin
decisions and actions. Thus, the danger Ilves pointed to is real: the Russians
may come back or at least try to – and they won’t be “constrained by communism.”
No comments:
Post a Comment