Paul
Goble
Staunton, October 6 – Russian nationalists
who have a positive view of Stalin usually cite his role in World War II and
his moves toward a more traditional Russia after that time. But some also invoke the Soviet dictator’s
earlier struggles against “internationalist” Jewish communists like Trotsky and
Zinovyev.
But in Russia today, an increasing
number of nationalists are praising Stalin for something else: for his role in
blocking those like Anatol Lunacharsky, Lenin’s commissar of enlightenment,
from changing the alphabet in which Russian is written from Cyrillic to the
Latin script, a step they view as among the worst forms of kowtowing to the West.
Over the last decade, this issue has
surfaced occasionally but usually in the context of discussions in other former
Soviet republics and especially the Turkic ones to shift from the
Cyrillic-based alphabets Stalin imposed in the 1930s to the Latin script that they
used earlier and that Turkey adopted in the 1920s (kprf.ru/pravda/issues/2006/21/article-10970/).
Now, the issue has surfaced again on
the TopNewsRussia site which has picked up a Russian nationalist’s blog post
and run it under the title “How ‘the Bloody Tyrant’ Saved ‘the Great and
Powerful’ from the Latinization of the Alphabet” (topnewsrussia.ru/kak-krovavyj-tiran-spas-velikij-i-moguchij-ot-latinizacii-alfavita/).
“Among the
contributions of Stalin to the Russian people is his defense of the traditional
alphabet of the Russian language – the Cyrillic one,” the article says. He had to defend it because “just after the
October revolution, certain ultra-revolutionaries tried to replace the Cyrillic
alphabet with the Latin one.”
Already in 1919, Lunacharsky’s
commissariat of enlightenment was pushing for this change, not only for “all
the peoples populating the territory of the republic” but also for Russian as
well, something his aides said would represent “the completion of the alphabet
reform” begun by Peter I.”
That position provoked anger among
many Russians, the blogger continues, including those organized in the Russia
Language Society, which said that such a path would be destructive not only of
the other languages in Russia but of Russian as well and would make the
rapprochement of the nationalities in that country difficult if not impossible.
“The supporters of the reform,
basing themselves on a international point of view, insist on introducing the
European script not only for the non-literary peoples of Russia but also for
Russian,” something that in addition “will not only not make easier but in fact
will make more difficult the study of Russian by foreigners.”
During the 1920s, moves to shift
Russian to the Latin script stalled, although Moscow did create Latin
script-based alphabets for many of the peoples of the USSR that had either not
had literary languages in the past, such as the numerically small peoples of
the North or that had used Arabic script, such as the major Turkic peoples of the
Caucasus and Central Asia.
But, the Russian nationalist blogger
continues, “the Trotskyites with their pseudo-internationalist demagogy did not
cease to try.” Ten years later, in January 1930, Lunacharsky issued another
call on the pages of “Krasnaya gazeta” to shift the Russian language to the
Latin script.
No longer commissar of enlightenment
– he had been replaced the year before by Andrey Bubnov, Lunacharsky even
invoked Lenin in support of the idea. He
said that the founder of the Soviet state approved the idea but said
introducing a Latin script for Russian was something that would have to wait
for “calmer times.”
That assertion, the Russian
nationalist says, is “a lie. There is no mention of this them in any of Lenin’s
works.” But Lunacharsky’s article was enough to get
things started again, and plans were made to hold a conference on this to push
the idea forward.
Bubnov appealed to the Communist
Party Central Committee, and Stalin responded ten days later. In his note to
the new commissar, the party secretary on behalf of the Politburo ordered all
work on Latinization to be stopped and the organizations pushing it to be
disbanded. That is exactly what happened.
Any talk about shifting to the Latin
script now, the blogger says, is “in general impermissible. Such news in the
press would generate great anger among the population. “And whoever in Russia
raises this issue,” he assures his readers, “will be considered the number one enemy
of the people.”
No comments:
Post a Comment