Paul
Goble
Staunton, November 14 – Having illegally
annexed Crimea in 2014, Igor Yakovenko says, Vladimir Putin infected Russia
with an incurable illness, one that his state-controlled television has spread
throughout the entire social fabric of the Russian Federation. And today, there
are no forces, including Putin, capable of preventing new outbreaks of this
illness.
In a commentary for the US-based
Russian language portal, “7 Days,” the Moscow commentator says that “Putin
today is absolutely powerless in the face of the illness which he gave birth.”
Before Crimea, he controlled things. Now, events are increasingly passing out of
his control (7days.us/igor-yakovenko-metastazy/).
The political system under Putin
since Crimea “does not have any analogues in history and is therefore can’t be analyzed
within the framework of customary political science categories,” Yakovenko
says. Especially inappropriate are those
which attempt to put Putin in the same category as Mao, given “Putin’s complete
lack of any ideas.”
Last week, Moscow political analyst
Nikita Petrov sought to analyze Putinism in “Vedomosti” (vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2016/11/08/663925-matreshki-peremen)
in which, Yakovenko says, he “justly points out the changes of the entire
configuration of elites” in Putin’s Moscow.
But when Petrov
says that “there is a supreme commander” (Putin) who makes all the decision and
directs all that is happening, Yakovenko argues, the Moscow analyst “creates a
completely false image of the political reality of contemporary Russia.”
“Unlike
Mao, Lenin, Stalin or Hitler,” he continues, “Putin at the moment of his coming
to power did not have any ideology and over the 17 years of power, he has not
developed one.” Intead, there is “a certain eclectic collection of values,”
some taken from his Petersburg childhood, some from the KGB, and some from the
1990s. But they are not a coherent
whole.
In large measure because of that, “Putin’s
Russia is a seriously ill country. The illness is called Putinism. Putin doesn’t
manage anything but is simply a primary malignant tumor, one that arose first in
the Kremlin thanks to Boris Nikolayevich and the ‘family’ and then thanks to
television metasticizing first in Crimea and the Donbass and now throughout all
of Russia.”
As the disease spreads, Yakovenko
continues, it infects ever more organs of “the social body and gives rise to
their total disfunctioning.” That sets Putinism apart from those with whom he
is often compared because he is also infected and is thus not in a position to
control the situation or make radical changes.
“Lenin introduced the cannibalistic ‘war
communism’ but then, having become convicted that this was a dead end, replaced
it with NEP. Mao started the insane ‘cultural resolution’ and he then
liquidated it when he understood that it was really threatening the life of the
country.” But Putin is not in a position “to struggle against the metasticizing
spread of ‘Crimea is Ours’ and ‘the Russian world’ because he is inseparable
from the illness and is himself part of it.”
And that has an important implication: one
can’t cure a disease by negotiation and so it is “useless” to continue to talk
with him. “The malignant tumor of Putnism must be removed by surgical means.
The alternative is the disappearance from the globe of a country called Russia,”
the only other way this cancer can be stopped.
No comments:
Post a Comment