Paul Goble
Staunton,
September 7 – No country in the post-Soviet space receives less coverage in the
West than Turkmenistan at least in part because the media outlets in that
country do not behave the way they do elsewhere and thus do not provide the kind
of information that directly or indirectly can help outsiders understand what
is going on.
In
a new Kazakhstan commentary, which draws on articles in the Western media about
Turkmenistan as well as the Turkmenistan files of the Fergana news agency, journalist
Roman Ivanov offers three insights into the nature of Turkmenistan’s media and thus
into Turkmenistan itself (365info.kz/2018/09/chto-proishodit-v-turkmenistane-na-samom-dele-obzor/).
First of all, he says, in
Turkmenistan, there is no such thing as the kind of media which exist elsewhere.
“What are called the media there,” he continues, “in fact play a decorative
role, an embellishment for the regime and an inexhaustible source of jokes for
foreigners” but seldom any news in the usual sense.
That is especially true, Ivanov
says, with regard to the official media which do not provide any information on
crime, accidents, or indeed anything negative. There is almost no world news
and in general there is no mention of the opposition.”
Second, Turkmens no longer believe
either the official press or the opposition media either. Ever more often, travelers report, “the
people consider that neither the one nor the other show a true picture” of what
is going on. But this lack of trust in
any media extends to friends and family as well.
No one trusts anyone else, Ivanov
says, “neither the powers that be, nor the banned opposition sources, nor even
their own friends and neighbors.” Instead, they rely on rumors, some put out by
the authorities but most created by the people themselves, rumors that have
little or no relationship to reality.
And third – and Ivanov stresses that
this is “the most interesting” aspect of media in Turkmenistan – the media
there “unlike the typical media of totalitarian states does not offer an image
of the enemy, neither external nor internal.” Instead, outlets promote the idea
that “neither other countries nor the opposition prevent the flourishing of the
Turkmen state.”
No one is accused of causing
problems, Ivanov says; instead, the media simply do not say anything at all.
That makes Turkmenistan an outlier
among totalitarian states given that all other ones in this category rely on the
image of enemies foreign and domestic to mobilize the population; and thus this
isolated Central Asian country raises the question as to whether the image of an
enemy is as necessary for totalitarian mobilization as most theorists believe.
No comments:
Post a Comment