Paul Goble
Staunton,
December 27 – Moscow plans to put a new motorized rifle division in Ingushetia in
the coming months and has asked republic head Yunus-Bek Yevkurov to provide 9,000
hectares of land for its base. Col.Gen. Aleksandr. Dvornikov told Yevkurov he
would like it to be in the Sunzhen district of Ingushetia near the republic’s border
with Chechnya.
The
republic’s independent news agency, Fortanga.org, which has a good track record
of reporting developments in Ingushetia before anyone else has obtained a copy
of this message as received by Yevkurov and has posted a photostat of it on its
website (fortanga.org/2018/12/v-ingushetii-planiruetsya-uvelichenie-chislennosti-rossijskih-vojsk/).
Dvornikov did not link this request which
is dated December 18 to the tensions between Ingushetia and Chechnya over the September
26 border accord but instead cast it as part of a general relocation of forces
in the North Caucasus. But it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that Moscow
wants to beef up its presence there because of those tensions.
Three other developments in the last
24 hours about the conflict over the border accord include:
·
The
Agora Human Rights Group has announced that it will organize an appeal of the
Russian Constitutional Court’s decision on the Chechen-Ingush border accord to
the European Court of Human Rights and also a second appeal on the fines levied
against those Ingush who protested the accord and that decision (info24.ru/news/soglashenie-o-granice-mezhdu-chechnej-i-ingushetiej-obzhalujut-v-espch.html).
·
The
Coordinating Center of Muslims of the North Caucasus has invited the mufti of
Ingushetia to a meeting on January 12 to discuss what a shariat court may and
may not decide. The Ingush mufti favors having such a court rule on the border
accord; the Coordinating Center says that is impermissible now that the Russian
court has ruled (kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/329667/).
·
The
Union of Teips of Ingushetia which favors the use of a shariat court to rule on
the border accord has told the republic’s alims that their failure to
participate in discussions about the organization of such court sessions
undermines their authority among the population (kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/329699/).
No comments:
Post a Comment