Paul Goble
Staunton,
December 20 – Many are saying Ukraine’s receipt of autocephaly from the
Universal Patriarch is for Russia an act equivalent to the demise of the Soviet
Union; but in fact, the editors of Ukraine’s Espresso TV say, it is even more
than that: it represents the destruction of the idea of Moscow as the third
Rome on which the Russian empire has rested for centuries.
“The
strengthening of Constantinople” – the “second” Rome – and the departure of
Ukraine from under the Russian Orthodox Church destroys one of the main
ideologemes, on which the Russian Empire has rested, the thesis about ‘Moscow
as the Third Rome’” (ru.espreso.tv/article/2018/12/20/kak_tomos_unychtozhaet_ymperskyy_slogan_quotmoskva_tretyy_rymquot).
According to
the station, “the theory of ‘Moscow as the Third Rome’ became the foundation of
messianic ideas about the role and significance of Russia. It was first
formulated in two letters in 1523-1524 by Filofey, an elder of Pskov’s Eleazor
Monastery,” although there have been suggestions that it was first circulated
several decades earlier.
The elder “put the Muscovite prince
on par with the Roman Emperor Constantine the Great, identifying the latter as
the ancestor of the prince.” Such ideas became possible after the Ottoman
Empire seized Constantinople, the Second Rome, in 1453. As a result, Byzantium
ceased to exist as a state and “as a center of world Orthodoxy.”
Moscow thus presented itself as its
successor civil and religious. In 1589,
the idea of Moscow as the Third Rome became official policy and the basis for
its imperial pretensions as unique and part of an apostolic succession. “Byzantium
had fallen; Moscow took its place. As Filofey wrote, “Moscow is the Third Rome;
a fourth there shall not be!”
The Third Rome doctrine was
especially popular during the reign of Alexander III and was popularized by
historian Vladimir Soloyev, who saw it as an indication that Moscow would unite
East and West in itself and thus create “the so-called world unity.” As such, it led to the formation of “’the
Russian idea.’”
Now, with Ukraine having achieved autocephaly,
the notion of Moscow as the Third Rome has been shown to be hollow. That is not
something that many Russians can easily accept; and it is why Russia will
continue to fight the rights of Ukraine and why the tomos is ultimately more
significant than the Beloveshchaya accords of 1991.
No comments:
Post a Comment