Paul
Goble
Staunton, May 26 – The collapse in the
share of Russians who say they trust Vladimir Putin to make decisions from 47.4
percent a year ago to 31.7 percent now, the lowest level in more than a decade,
has prompted the SerpomPo Telegram Channel to say “Putin is in free fall” and
that further declines can be expected (t.me/SerpomPo/3216).
The telegram channel even sees the
pictures of the Kremlin leader falling while playing hockey as symbolic and
makes two further points: If these are the figures reported by VTsIOM which has
a track record of being close to the Kremlin and therefore can be expected to
make Putin look as good as possible, what are the real ones?
And if the 31.7 percent is an
overall figure, what must it be for those protesting in Yekaterinburg, Petersburg,
Chelyabinsk and Murmansk, not to mention many other places, or for pensioners
or for the enormous number of Russians who have become poorer over the last six
years of his watch?
How much longer are these millions
going to put up with their futures being stolen by Putin and his cronies? Is
the time approaching when they will say “’Enough,’” SerpomPo asks. “Of will they like their Soviet grandparents
or parents be patient and wait until ‘the body is carried out?’”
In pointing to such long-standing Russian
patience, SerpomPo is qualifying its own headline; but there are two other
reasons for qualifying it as well. On
the one hand, Putin still controls the agenda and can take actions that will
boost his rating. In the past, those have involved military action, making this
poll result a matter of concern not just for him.
And on the other hand, as opposition
leader Mikhail Khodorkovsky points out, while Putin’s numbers are low for an
authoritarian leader in control of the media, they are not significantly lower
than those a leader of a democratic society would consider perfectly reasonable
(echo.msk.ru/programs/year2019/2431655-echo/).
One should therefore not overread
them as the SerpomPo headline almost certainly does, but such reporting has
consequences all its own. Once people talk about a leader’s failures in this
way, it is almost a repetition of the Chekhovian principle that if a gun is
displayed in the first act, it must go off before the end of the third.
No comments:
Post a Comment