Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 16 – When Moscow
banned the Jehovah’s Witnesses in 2017, many observers, including this writer,
felt that the most likely course of development would be for that denomination
to follow the path taken by so many religious groups in Soviet times and become
an underground “catacomb” church.
But in what must be the most
remarkable development even as Russian government persecution of the Witnesses
has continued and in recent days intensified, they have not gone underground
but have continued to act as a normal above-ground faith, meeting openly even
though their kingdom halls have been taken from them.
As Moscow’s Novaya gazeta and the
experts on religious affairs it spoke with note, the Russian courts banned the
formal structures of the Jehovah’s Witnesses but insisted they were not banning
the faith as such. And the Witnesses have used this “paradox” to continue to
practice (novayagazeta.ru/articles/2020/07/16/86294-peredel-nebes).
As a result, as Nikolay Sapelkin, a Russian
historian of religion, says, “the current loss of registration has not
significantly influenced the situation of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. For more
than a quarter of a century, they have created their own commercial firms and
organized a ramified system of interaction.”
Despite the ban on the formal
structures, “the communities haven’t gone anywhere. Instead, they are
continuing their activity in the new circumstances. The only difficulties
involve the recruitment of new followers since they are not permitted to engage
in open missionary activity,” Sapelkin argues.
As even Vladimir Putin recognized,
finding the Witnesses to be extremists opens a can of worms Moscow doesn’t want
to do. If one agreed to that, it would be possible to find all the traditional
religions of Russia “extremist,” something no one at present wants to do given
the reaction it would provoke.
And Aleksandr Verkhovsky, head of
the SOVA information and analysis center, adds, the history of the Russian
state’s relationship with the Jehovah’s Witnesses is “not unique” but rather
follows the pattern of banning texts as extremist, then banning local groups
that possess these texts, and then prohibiting the all-Russian organization of
which they are a part.
What that leads to is all too
obvious: The constitution gives Russians the right to profess their faith
because “faith itself cannot be prohibited.” But when the Jehovah’s Witnesses
practice their faith, Verkhovsky continues, the authorities insist that they
are violating the law by assembling in groups banned by the courts.
“This technique is not unique,” but
the extent of it in the case of the Jehovah’s Witnesses is. “In the post-Soviet
period, criminal cases have not multiplied as fast for other groups as they
have for the Witnesses,” a pattern which is leading to the undermining of “one
of the key freedoms” the constitution describes.
By not going underground but
continuing to practice their faith in the open to the extent they can, the
Jehovah’s Witnesses are calling attention to this threat and represent the
first line of defense against it.
No comments:
Post a Comment