Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 16 – A remarkable
political transformation has taken place beneath the radar screen of many in
Moscow, Aleksandr Baunov says. Vladimir Zhirinovsky’s Liberal Democratic Party
of Russia has been transformed for its original status as the party of empire
in the late 1980s and early 1990s to the party of federalism now.
That evolution reflects less a
change in Zhirinovsky’s convictions than the pressure of those who vote for his
party. They come from distant regions and have voted for the LDPR to protest
Moscow and its United Russia Party; and as a result, the party increasingly advocates
federalism, the Moscow analyst says (echo.msk.ru/blog/partofair/2677191-echo/).
The LDPR began as a party of empire
and “in essence, an anti-federalist” one, the editor of the Carnegie Moscow
Center’s portal says. It called for the recovery of Finland and Alaska and
advocated a strong central government to rule over the entire country. “This
was its identity.”
Now, however, “de facto,” it has
become “the party of federalism,” reflecting its electoral strength in the
Russian Far East and its victory in Khabarovsk Oblast, a victory Moscow wanted
to overturn but is now under pressure to recognize by appointing another LDPR activist
governor in place of Sergey Furgal whom it arrested.
The Kremlin can hardly ignore this
in Khabarovsk or elsewhere lest it face even more protests, Baunov says. However hobbled they may appear, parties “all
the same exist in Russia” and anyone in power who wants to work with a region
must at least in part deal with that party which has won the most votes.
This change calls attention to
something else, the analyst says. Anti-Kremlin and anti-Putin protests may be
anti-Moscow but that is not necessarily the case if Moscow respects the
victories of a party which is based in the center but whose electorate is
elsewhere. If the Kremlin doesn’t do this, then the LDPR could evolve in yet a
more radical way.
No comments:
Post a Comment