Paul
Goble
Staunton, January 13 – The Duma on
first reading approved a bill that would allow the government to identify
individuals and not just groups as “foreign agents,” an action that Novaya
gazeta says means that “if your grandmother in Kazakhstan sends you 100
dollars, you can become a foreign agent.”
The measure which makes no
distinction between money from from private individuals and groups and from
governments received 333 votes from United Russia and Just Russia. The KPRF and
LDPR deputies didn’t vote (www.novayagazeta.ru/articles/2018/01/13/75128-esli-babushka-iz-kazahstana-prislala-vam-sto-dollarov-vy-mozhete-stat-inoagentom).
That in turn means that almost all
Russians could be held to have violated this measure should it become law. That is because, Damir Gaynutdinov, a lawyer
who works with the Agora rights group, says, everyone can be deemed to be “a
distributor of information” and almost everyone will have received a cash
present from a relative abroad.
An additional repressive measure in
the new bill is a requirement that all users of social networks indicate that
information they are republishing from foreign agent media comes from such
media. This would be similar to rules
under which Russian outlets are required to specify that any reference to a
group Moscow has classified as terrorist have a note to that effect.
Failure to do so, Moscow political
analyst Aleksey Makarkin says, would open the way to the blocking of sites that
by failing to follow the rules were promoting terrorism or extremism. The most
likely consequence of this will be a decline in the reposting of materials that
are in any way questionable from the point of view of the powers that be.
And the Duma measure also calls for
registering all foreign media with the Russian government as foreign agents,
unless they create a special and separate Russian segment. If that segment already exists, then the
foreign media are obligated to report that or face being blocked or restricted
in operation.
That in turn will give Moscow
hostages that it can trade, opening the way for more pressure than it can
impose at present when its only option often is to block sites for media
outlets based abroad, media rights experts say.
But they add that this law if
approved is unlikely to be implemented as intended. “Not a single repressive
law adopted in recent times has been applied in the form in which it is
written.” But that doesn’t eliminate the
damage that a measure opening the way to arbitrary action by the authorities
can and will do.
No comments:
Post a Comment