Paul
Goble
Staunton, January 25 – Soviet leader
Nikita Khrushchev denounced Stalin for building up “a cult of personality,” and
Soviet dissidents described the situation under Leonid Brezhnev as “a cult
without a personality.” But now Tata Gutmakher says, Vladimir Putin, in an act
of cowardice before the late dictator, has formed “a cult of the cult of
personality.”
The Moscow commentator draws that
conclusion on the basis of Moscow’s decision to ban the satirical film, “The
Death of Stalin,” an action that the Kremlin says is not an act of censorship (rbc.ru/society/25/01/2018/5a69a57a9a79471fa928c29f) but that she and many others can clearly see is exactly
that (kasparov.ru/material.php?id=5A68C3683E4CA).
And
what that means, Gutmakher continues, is that “in present-day Russia the ruler
isn’t event a tyrant but rather cowardice in the face of this tyrant.” Those
who fear Stalin now insist that “in Russia, the death of Stalin must never be,
even in a movie” and declare that they will “resist [this] historical truth”
and treat that monster as a kind of saint.
But this ban on satire has an unexpected
outcome, she continues. It means that the regime is afraid of such a portrayal
of the past – and that in turn shows that the satire in this case is “working”
as intended. And the ban also calls attention to the fact that the authorities
are using expressions lifted directly from Stalinist times.
Gutmakher’s
comments reflect the judgment of many in the Russian blogosphere (kasparov.ru/material.php?id=5A679A5C5821A)
who are simultaneously laughing at the absurdity of the Kremlin action and
worried about the fact that this ban suggests where Vladimir Putin is headed (interfax.ru/culture/596830 and rosbalt.ru/blogs/2018/01/24/1676932.html).
No comments:
Post a Comment