Paul
Goble
Staunton, January 15 – Eighty years
ago this month, a group of Soviet citizens wrote to their government proposing
that it rename Moscow. In the context of the Great Terror, they immediately
were charged with crimes and repressed. But that was not the first such popular
initiative in this regard.
In 1927, Aleksey Volodin writes on
the Top War portal, another group of
Russians, mostly from Tambov, called for renaming the USSR capital “’Ilich’ in
Lenin’s honor given that according to them, “’Moscow is not a Russian name’” (topwar.ru/133739-delo-8-56s-kak-moskvu-pereimenovat-pytalis.html).
“’Ilich’”
or “’Gorod Ilich’” they insisted was a name which would connect “the hearts and
minds of the proletarian” more than the senseless name ‘Moscow’ which is
neither Russian nor has any logical roots,” the historian says. Neither the
proposals from 1927 nor those from 1938 were accepted, and Moscow remained
Moscow.
According to
Volodin, historians still disagree on why that was so. Some say that it was
because the Soviet leadership noting that one capital was already called
Leningrad thought that renaming Moscow in his honor would be excessive. Others say that some in 1938 wanted to rename
Moscow for Stalin, but he too already had another citied named for him.
To meet the objection that there was
already one Stalingrad (since 1925), the writers of the 1938 letters suggested
that the capital might be renamed “’Stalinadar’” meaning “’the Gift of Stalin.’” Archivists say that some of those making this
proposal were communist activists who wanted to show themselves absolutely
loyal.
One of their number justified the
name change because the Soviet Union had just adopted the new “Stalinist”
constitution. Several other people wrote in identical messages, a pattern that
suggests, Volodin argues, that this “’popular campaign’” may in fact have been
created by people in Stalin’s own entourage
In particular, some historians say
that the recently opened archival documents suggest that NKVD chief Nikolay
Yezhov may have been the instigator not only because of certain charges brought
against him after he was ousted but also because letter writing on this subject
stopped – or at least hasn’t been retained in the archives -- after his
dismissal.
But this history about the possibility
of renaming Moscow may be nothing more than a variant on some earlier Soviet
proposals to rename the USSR, “form the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics
into the Union of Soviet Stalinist Republics.” That was too much even more
Stalin – and thus it never happened.
No comments:
Post a Comment