Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 17 – Andrey
Pozdnyakov, a marketing specialist in Novosibirsk, says that Siberian
regionalists are looking to and being inspired by the historical development of
Lithuania, Belarus and Ukraine as alternatives to the centralized and
authoritarian patterns of the development of the Russian state.
On the one hand, he says, in the
course of discussion with publicist Dmitry Khodyavcheno and Tayga research
company head Aleksandr Bayanov, Siberians in various places have been affected
by the powerful regional korenizatsiya [“rooting’] that has occurred
throughout Russia as people have travelled less to Moscow and more to their
neighbors.
And on the other, a broader Siberian
identity has emerged because of an increasing recognition that despite
differences among its residents, they are united by “anti-Moscow attitudes” and
see themselves as following in the tradition of Novgorod the Great and the
Grand Duchy of Lithuania (tayga.info/146980;
excerpted in region.expert/siberia-identity/).
There is no
question that a Siberian identity exists, Pozdnyakov says, citing the
fundamental work of Novosibirsk scholars Alla Anisimova and Olga Yechevskaya (intelros.ru/readroom/laboratorium/c3-2013/18752-sibiryak-obschnost-nacionalnost-ili-sostoyanie-dushi.html).
But it is still
very unequally developed, he acknowledges. “Tomsk residents identify as Tomsk
residents; Irkutsk residents identify as Irkutsk residents; but Novosibirsk
residents identify as Siberians,” because it is a younger city and one whose
residents travel more in the region than they do to Moscow.
There has been a broader Siberian
identity elsewhere but it has intensified in the last decade or so. The reason is simple: “anti-Moscow attitudes”
reflecting the center’s taking so much more away from the region than it gives
and ruling with an increasingly iron hand rather than democratically.
Pozdnyakov has attracted attention
for lectures he has been giving in Novosibirsk about the Grand Duchy of
Lithuania, the study of that alternative to Muscovite state traditions which
has led him to learn Belarusian and see it as an alternative, along with
Ukraine. All three nations, he stresses,
have helped form Siberia because so many from them were exiled there.
What he and other Siberian
regionalists are seeking to do is to recover that side of the history of Russia
that was democratic and European and thus opposed to Muscovite authoritarianism
and centralization. Such values unite not only Siberians but all those who have
lived under Moscow’s control.
No comments:
Post a Comment