Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 19 – Sanctions against
Moscow for its violation of international law in Ukraine are important and
worth maintaining as a statement of what the West stands for even if they won’t
change the policy of a dictator unlikely to be swayed by the impact they have
on his people and may even allow him for a time at least to mobilize them on an
anti-Western basis.
And while the imposition and even
strengthening of sanctions against Moscow regarding its actions in Crimea and the
Donbass may not lead the current leader of the Russian Federation to change course,
dropping them will have real consequences for him and for the influence of the West
in support of international law.
On the one hand, if sanctions are
reduced because businesses in the West want profit and governments want to deal
with Russia on other issues, Putin not only will have won this round simply by
waiting the West out but will take it as a given that he can engage in other
aggressive actions in the future – and get away with them when the Western
democracies grow tired.
If sanctions end, that will send a
message to the peoples of Russia that the Kremlin has won, undercutting those
many heroic people there who oppose the authoritarian Putin regime and who hope
to build a very different Russia after he passes from the scene as he inevitably
will. They will be weakened, and those
who want to continue Putin’s course will be strengthened.
And on the other, if the sanctions
are lifted, that will send another and even more profound message: the West is
not prepared to stand up for its principles and consequently rogue leaders like
Putin can get away with almost any violation of international norms as long as
they have weapons that no one wants to see used.
As a result, ever more countries
will go nuclear on the assumption that having such weapons not only means “never
having to say you’re sorry” but also allows you to do what you want. Consequently, the sanctions against Putin’s
criminal behavior must be maintained not only in the hope that Russia will ultimately
change but also so international law will triumph.
These thoughts are prompted by Ukrainian
commentator Vitaly Portnikov question today: “Are “Crimean sanctions are an
instrument or a symbol?” a question prompted
by Berlin’s renewed commitment to maintain sanctions even as it allows Moscow
back into PACE (ru.krymr.com/a/vitaliy-portnikov-krymskie-sankcii-instrument-ili-simvol/30008024.html).
Sanctions are in
fact both an instrument and a symbol, an instrument even if they do not change
the policy of their immediate target quickly and a symbol of what the West is
about both with regard to Russia, the rest of the world and not unimportantly itself. Tragically, those in the West who are
prepared to give up all this in pursuit of short-term gains are growing in
number.
That is something dictators like
Putin have long counted on. Most of them know that playing the long game will
work for them because there will always be voices in the Western democracies who
will call for reaching out and overcoming differences regardless of what those
regimes have done.
But the most important victories the
West has won in the last half century have come precisely when it stood up for
its principles and when because it did it could appeal to others to do the same
rather than live in fear rather than when its leaders in the name of profit and
convenience sold out.
That is a point, as Portnikov makes clear,
that needs to be repeated again and again.
No comments:
Post a Comment