Paul
Goble
Staunton, March 14 – Suggestions
that Vladimir Putin may restart his amalgamation campaign to reduce the number
of federal subjects by combining smaller non-Russian areas with larger ethnic
Russian ones (windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2020/03/will-jewish-ao-be-absorbed-by.html)
is leading some to examine what happened when he managed to do that earlier.
What such examinations show is that
this action did little to improve the situation of either the place that was
absorbed or the place that did the absorbing, that many of the promises
officials made to gain approval of these changes haven’t been kept, and that the
absorbing region hasn’t even bothered to adopt legislation needed to make the
combination work.
In an article entitled “A Disputed
Union,” Anatoly Kvasov, a journalist for the EastRussia.ru portal, says that “the
unification of Chita Oblast and Agin-Buryat AO” into the TransBaikal Kray 12
years ago “has not achieved many of the promises” its backers made (eastrussia.ru/material/spornyy-soyuz-kak-izmenilos-zabaykale-za-12-let-sushchestvovaniya/).
Prior to their unification, Moscow
considered uniting other pairs of subjects – Adygeya and Krasnodar Kray and the
Altay with the Altay Republic – but there was so much opposition that the central
government turned to Chita Oblast and the Agin-Buryat AO as something less than
its first choice.
Putin’s decision to go ahead was not
met with enthusiasm by Buryatia which hoped to reclaim the district for itself
or with more than pro forma backing by the population of the Agin-Buryat AO who
were promised a lot and in fact had no choice but to go along. And the first
years were bumpy (windowoneurasia.blogspot.com/2009/06/window-on-eurasia-putin-policies.html).
But in the last decade except for
the occasional article in the Buryat Republic media, the situation in the
former Agin-Buryat AO has been largely ignored. It is so small – 7500 square
kilometers and 75,000 people – and so far away that it has only rarely even
been mentioned in the central Russian media.
Now, with talk of amalgamations
returning, it is getting more attention. Former officials say that the people there
are disappointed because the social and economic situation did not become
better as they were promises, and in places in the new kray, the situation “deteriorated,
especially for the Agin district.”
Chita rarely focuses on its concerns
and the region has not flourished by languished as a backwater, local experts
say. Still worse, they have no firm
legal foundation for doing anything about it: the law that the new kray was
supposed to pass about the district has not been taken up even though the union
is now 12 years old.
No comments:
Post a Comment