Paul
Goble
Staunton, March 20 – The declarations
by ten Ingush teips that their members should boycott the April 22 referendum
on the amendments to the Russian Constitution constitutes a clear warning to
the Kremlin about how the population feels about being ignored and mistreated,
Izabella Yevloyeva says.
But as long as these are issued by
the teips rather than individuals, the editor of the independent Fortanga
portal says, the powers that be are unlikely to react: they can’t arrest all
the members of these extended family groups. If these appeals were to be
signed, the signatories would no doubt be arrested (belaruspartisan.by/politic/494779/).
“These appeals,” she continues, “have
been made anonymously because people have learned from bitter experience that
as soon as you show civic activity, someone from the anti-extremist center will
inevitably come after you, even in the case of those actions which are
permitted by law, even for pickets.”
“When two sisters of political
prisoner Zarifa Sautiyeva engaged in individual pickets, they were immediately
taken to a police station and talked to. The powers do not want to see any form
of civic activity. Shut up and sit silently. When you feel you have to open
your mouths, we will put you in jail.”
“If the Kremlin wanted to find out
what is happening,” Yevlovyeva continues, “this would be a not very good signal
for the authorities which they would have to consider,” especially since “signals
from other regions are also coming in,” although the powers are ignoring them
too. “This cannot continue forever.”
When one of your organs is infected,
she concludes, you at first may try to ignore it, “but sooner of later the
disease progresses. That is how it is in Russia in the regions – many signals
are being sent to Moscow.” Eventually, even it will have to take these into
consideration, the editor concludes.
Meanwhile, a Russian court extended
the detention of three more Ingush prisoners, Barakh Chemurziyev, Musa
Malsagov, and Akhmed Barakhoyev, yet again, this time to April 11. The court
refused to allow relatives to attend or to hand over medicines for the detainees
(kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/347310/ and kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/347340/).
Lawyers had sought house arrest for
the detainees who are at no risk of flight or intimidating witnesses, but the
court refused. Representatives of Chemurziyev in response have filed a second
appeal with the European Court of Human Rights. Attorneys for the others are
pursuing cases in appellate courts in Russia.
No comments:
Post a Comment