Paul Goble
Staunton, May 17 – At the end of
Costa Garves’ classic 1969 film “Z” – Greek for “He lives” – about the
suppression of an investigation by a Greek junta, the screen goes blank and
then follows a list of things that the junta bans, including chewing gum, mini-skirts,
Plato, and democracy.
That now-distant mirror comes to
mind when one reads Nikolay Kuznetsov’s listing on Profile.ru of the ten increasingly
repressive and ultimately self-destructive “bans” that some Russian politicians
have proposed and some Russian government agencies have adopted (profile.ru/society/item/81994-rossiya-zapreshchaet). The ten include:
1.
The
closing of 11 GPS stations, an action Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin said
had been taken in response to the suspension of eight GLONASS stations in the
United States, stations that the US concluded Russia was using to collect
intelligence data.
2.
A
prohibition on the use of rocket motors for the launch of US military
satellites. In fact, as Kunetsov noted , the US had already decided not to
purchase any of them as part of its sanctions regime.
3.
A
group of Duma deputies want to ban advertising of condoms, pregnancy tests, and
birth control medications. Such things, the deputies said, should only be advertised
in “specialized publications.” The same
deputies also wanted to prohibit any advertisements by abortion providers. These
bans have been rejected by the parliament.
4.
A
month earlier, the foreign trade ministry proposed a ban on the import of
medical equipment produced abroad, ranging from syringes to specialized
instruments for coronary surgery.
Russian Deputy Prime Minister Olga Golodets said that Russian medicine “today
is well supplied [with its own domestically produced equipment] but is
experiencing a shortage of qualified doctors.”
5.
Another
group of Duma deputies proposed a ban on the use of telephones produced abroad.
They said that this would “increase the defense of the military and civil
telecommunications systems of the country.” At present, imported telephones of
various kinds make up “about 90 percent” of this segment of the market.
6.
On
March 4, Moscow officials called for a ban on the import of American pork
because they said “the security of its production could not be guaranteed. Such a prohibition was in fact imposed in
February 2013 but then lifted. US pork
exports to Russia have been running at 1.3 million tons a year. Russian
officials say that ending imports won’t lead to any shortages.
7.
Several
Duma deputies want to ban Western accounting firms like Ernst&Young,
McKinsey and Company, and KPMG form working in Russia and evaluating the
activity of Russian government agencies involved in the economy. The deputies say that such a ban will allow
the Russian government and economic sectors to “become more independent.”
8.
Vitaly
Milonov, a Duma deputy who gained international notoriety for his anti-gay
propaganda law, now wants to prevent Conchita Wurst, who won the Euro-Vision
song festival as a bearded lady, from entering Russia. Milonov earlier tried to
block Lady Gaga and Madonna from coming to Russia.
9.
Another
Duma deputy, Oleg Mikheyev, who is the deputy chairman of the parliament’s
energy committee, wants, in the words of Kuznetsov, “to struggle with violence
by banning any romanticization of the criminal world” in books, music, films,
or the mass media. According to
Mikheyev, “in order to build a full-fledged civil society in Russia, factors
which lead people to illegal behavior or justify it must be excluded.”
10.
Finally,
Vladimir Zhirionovsky, the head of the LDPR Party and the source of many
flamboyant and outrageous suggestions that sometimes have anticipated the
direction Moscow will take wants to ban any appearance of Ukrainian artists and
talents “who ‘occupy a anti-Russian position.’”
This list could easily be expanded to
include things like the statements of Rogozin that the next time he travels to
Moldova or Romania, he will be on a Russian bomber. And it is worth noting that
many of these outrageous ideas may be nothing more than attempts to attract
media attention and that at least so far few of them have led to actions.
But the analogy with Costa Garves’ film
is worth recalling for another reason. As the title of his film suggested and
as history played out, those who banned all those things were ultimately driven
from the political scene by those who believed in the ideas and values that the
authoritarians found so threatening.
No comments:
Post a Comment