Paul
Goble
Staunton, November 10 – The primitivism
in the thinking of Vladimir Putin and his entourage reflects the fact that he
and they are members of the generation that was “the most Soviet of all those
who arose after 1917,” cut off from those who could remember pre-1917
conditions and fully socialized in the communist system, according to Ekaterina
Schulmann.
In today’s “Vedomosti,” the Moscow
commentator points to a recent remark by Putin about competition, one that
shows that he doesn’t accept the idea of free competition but rather believes
that, as Soviet ideologists held, free competition opens the way for the full
use of administrative resources of those in power (vedomosti.ru/opinion/news/35731381/kapitalizm-po-leninu?full#cut).
For normal people, “a competitive
struggle typically presupposes that the participatns perform similar work and
those who do it best win.” But what Putin believes as did his Soviet
instructors is that competition is anything but free if he has the power to
affect it not in the normal way but through the use of power.
That attitude about competition
comes directly from Lenin, Schulman says, and it was inculcated into the minds
of Soviet citizens and to none of them more than those now 50 and older who
have power in the Russian Federation, “the most Soviet” of all generations
arising since 1917.
This generation “was born after the
war,” and its members were “cut off forever” from any memory about pre-Soviet Russia
or those who could remember it. “They passed through the full course of
ideological indoctrination … [and] they were taught Marxist-Leninist philosophy
and political economy.”
Even as this
generation has had to function in a post-communist environment, its members
have nonetheless retained many of the values and views that they received at
any earlier time. They thus have no problem with the notion that “bourgeois”
competition can yield super profits – but now for them rather than for someone
else.
Russians
reformers in the 1990s, Schulmann writes, “considered that the transition of the
economy ‘unto market rails’ by itself would create around itself a democratic
political system because in their minds was the [Marxist] thesis about ‘base
and superstructure,’” rather than any more sophisticated idea.
“The mystical
vision of the universe as ‘a zero sum game,’ where changing actors struggle for
an unchanged pie of ‘resources,’ also is an inheritance of a vulgarized
proposition of Marxism with its word competition of imperialist powers,” and it
is equally primitive and wrong, Schulmann says.
Many in
post-Soviet Russia joke that capitalism is being built in their country
according to the caricatures that used to be found in the Soviet humor magazine
“Krokodil,” but those anecdotes carry with them a great deal of truth. The
Putin generation remains trapped in the ideological framework of their
primitive understanding of Marxism.
“What progress
can there be” if such thinking remains? Schulman asks rhetorically. And she
answers “none” at all. For those with this habit of mind, “the Internet arose
as a CIA project and thus it has developed and always will be a CIA project.
States will eternally fight for resources, domestic unhappiness will be
provoked from outside, law is a formality, rules a piece of paper, and justice
does not exist.”
As the Moscow
writer says, “the doctrine of Marx is all powerful for those who believe in it.”
No comments:
Post a Comment