Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 20 – “If it does not
carry out reforms,” Kseniya Yudayeva, the first deputy head of the Central
Bank, told a conference at Moscow’s Higher School of Economics, “Russia will be
condemned to the maintenance of the
existing economic structure and ‘eternal stagnation.’”
Specifically, she said, “if a targeted
structural policy designed to create possibilities and stimuli for increasing
labor productivity and the diversification of the economy, [Russia’s] growth
rates will remain low” (vedomosti.ru/economics/articles/2016/04/19/638290-rossii-grozit-vechnaya-stagnatsiya).
In this regard, she and other
participants in the meeting said, “Russia recalled the USSR at the start of the
1970s,” adding that “now, the economy is at almost full capacity, and this
means that growth is possible only on the basis of investment – but not on just
any but only on those directed at raising labor productivity.”
That will require, Yudayev says, the
development of competition in the Russian economy “which will allow ineffective
firms to be driven from the market and new high productive ones to take their
place.” At present, this is not happening; and new work places “are being
created only in the informal sector which is not distinguished by high
productivity.”
There is a widespread misconception,
the central banker says, that Russia could achieve this by simply printing more
money and injecting it into the economy. “But in the absence of a good
investment climate, [such money from savings] would not become investments but
rather the source of capital flight.”
Another misconception, she says,
arises from confusion between business cycles and economic growth and requires
that the Central Bank and the state budget somehow support growth even when “the
slowdown is connected not with cyclical elements but with structural problems.”
Russia’s current problems are not
the result of the business cycle but rather resemble “the bursting of a bubble”
with the collapse of oil prices, Yudayeva says. Consequently, as the experience
of other countries has shown, what is required to move forward is very
different than simply the expansion of a general stimulus.
No comments:
Post a Comment