Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 19 – The failure of
the four all-Russian political parties to address ethnic issues in their
programs has prompted non-Russian activists in the Middle Volga to call for a vote
“against all” in party list competitions but to support individual candidates in single-member districts who
have focused on nationality questions.
On the one hand, this is clearly an
effort by non-Russian activists to force the major parties to take positions on
issues of special importance to non-Russian communities. But on the other, if
they don’t, this call may affect the outcomes of races in the two kinds of
elections that will fill the new duma.
And to the extent that some of the
candidates of the major parties running in single member districts do win after
issuing programmatic statements on nationality issues, that could lead via this
backdoor to the formation of “a nationalities caucus” in each of them and more
attention to ethnic issues in the Russian parliament.
The appeal came at a meeting of the
Fourth Congress of the Association of the Indigenous Peoples of the Russian
Federation held last weekend in Ufa.
Specifically the meeting made the following declaration:
“In view of the fact
that not one of the existing political parties of the Russian Federation has
formulated its position on the rights of indigenous peoples and the
ratification of the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the
Association of the Indigenous Peoples of the Russian Federation proposes that
the indigenous peoples participate in the election of deputies of the State
Duma by means of voting against all candidates by party lists but supports
those candidates in single-member districts who speak for the preservation and
further development of language, culture, history of national territorial
formations, their borders, their organization and constitutions” (openrussia.org/post/view/14412/
and kyk-byre.ru/1966-16-aprelya-2016-g-v-ufe-proshel-iv-sezd-associacii-korennyh-narodov-rf.html).
Among the groups taking part in the
meeting were the Kuk-Bure movement of Bashkortostan and the following groups
from Tatarstan: the Tatar Social Chamber of Naberezhnye Chelny, the Shura of Aksakals,
the Azatlyk Union of Tatar Youth, and the Altyn Urda Tatar Patriotic Front.”
All supported the declaration as did
representatives of the Ireklekh National Rebirth Society of Chuvashia, the On
Kangash Council of Elders of Mari El, and the Buryat regional organization,
Burdyaad soyel.
No comments:
Post a Comment