Paul
Goble
Staunton, October 22 -- “Despite the
fact that Central Asia is considered part of the Islamic world, it has not yet
become such,” according to Muratbek Imanaliyev, a Kyrgyz official who served as
secretary general of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization between 2010 and
2012, in a paper prepared for the Valdai Club.
Instead, he argues, the region “remains
a fragment of the post-Soviet space and is separated from the rest of the world,
including the Islamic one, by powerful values inherited from ‘the Soviet civilizational
universe’ including … even certain elements of its worldview” (ru.valdaiclub.com/a/highlights/tsentralnaya-aziya-prostranstvo/).
The challenges and threats, “connected
above all with religious extremism, terrorism and other manifestations of
trans-border crime, despite the fact that the countries of Central Asia are
mostly populated by Muslims are not distinguished from those in Europe,” he
says, and “the frequency and scale of extremist phenomena are an order lower
than in many other countries.”
Many people over the years have suggested that
the Fergana Valley is on the verge of an explosion, “but 25 years have passed,
and the valley lives in a peaceful and stable way. Yes, there were conflicts
and terrorist actions but not more often or more horrific than in other parts
of the planet.”
“At the same time,” the Kyrgyz
politician says, leaders in Central Asia are very well aware of the dangers and
threats within the region as a result of “the growing geopolitical conflicts of
the great powers, the struggle for resources, terrorism and religious extremism.”
And they wonder about their potential role in promoting geopolitical
cooperation and mediation.
But the Central Asian leaders can
also see that in their region, “the influence of the strong of this world has
been and remains fragmentary.” The West half-heartedly promoted democracy, and
others sometimes paid attention and sometimes didn’t. But neither could afford
to ignore the region entirely.
“Central Asia has always played the
role of an intra-continental connecting corridor,” and elites there, sometime
with the help of outsiders and sometimes on their own, “are trying to revive and
reconstruct these integrative traditions” and to build security both by
abjuring nuclear ambitions and seeking cooperation.
According to Imanaliyev, “one should
not say that the necessary efforts are not being undertaken, but the impression
has been created that they are leading to results directly opposite to the
goals proclaimed. There needs to be a
different conception of dialogue” if things are to move forward.
No comments:
Post a Comment