Paul Goble
Staunton,
December 6 – One of the clearest early warning signs of Moscow’s plans are suggestions
in the Russian media that the country’s opponents are planning to do the same
thing, a tactic that helps to distract attention from what Russia is doing and
then helps to muddy the waters once the Russian move comes.
Now,
Russian commentator Yevgeny Ikhlov says, Moscow is ramping up suggestions that
the West is preparing a chemical attack in the Donbass. Such suggestions, he continues,
“as the experience of Syria shows, is a very bad sign” of what the Russian side
itself may be planning (kasparov.ru/material.php?id=5C07E9D8E1309).
To be sure, Ikhlov
says, “the version of a future ‘chemical attack’ [by the West] is split:
According to one version, the chemical attack will be carried out against
Ukrainian units as a provocation; according to the other, it will be ‘against the
peaceful population of the Donbass.’”
But this is easy to explain: it helps
to divert attention and makes it less likely that the UN Security Council will
take up the matter when and if the Russians use such weapons. And there is another
plus in this regard for Moscow: a chemical provocation “of the Syrian type”
would give a pretext for Moscow to send into the Donbass specialists in coping
with chemical attacks.
Such actions would put Kyiv in a
difficult position. All too many would be inclined to blame Ukraine rather than
Russia for what would be Russia’s actions, and any Ukrainian response other
than doing nothing would be invoked by Russia and its supporters as evidence
that the chemical attack was part of broader Ukrainian aggression.
In short, such a “Syrian” option in
Ukraine would work to Moscow’s advantage, thus making it more likely, with a
singular exception: an attack of that kind could have the unintended
consequence of further radicalizing Ukrainian society and leading it to
mobilize fully to drive the Russians out, even if Moscow hopes that the West
would work to restrain Kyiv in that regard.
No comments:
Post a Comment