Paul Goble
Staunton,
December 8 – By imposing total control on the officials of the Russian
government at all levels, Vladimir Putin has left himself open to being held
responsible for everything that goes on in his country, Vadim Shtepa says. When
conditions are good, he gets the credit; when they aren’t, he gets the blame.
That,
more than the evaporation of the so-called “Crimean consensus,” explains why the
Kremlin leader’s approval ratings have sunk and are unlikely to improve until
the situation in the country improves, something the prospects for which are
not promising, according to the Russian regionalist now living in exile in
Estonia (icds.ee/ru/istoricheskij-majatnik-kachnulsja/).
Had Putin allowed
other officials to have more independent responsibility, they would have had to
shoulder the blame; but because his power vertical concentrates all powers in
his hands, he gets the blame rather more than in the past. As a result, the old
paradigm of the good tsar with bad
boyars has been replaced by the bad tsar.
At the same time, Shtepa says, there
has been two other shifts in Russian attitudes that affect Putin’s standing,
again one of his own making because of his continuing promises, left
unfulfilled, that Russians will live ever better as seemed possible in the period
before the 2008 crisis.
The first involves a shift away from
the idea that Russians were prepared to live poorly as long as their country
was powerful, an attitude political scientist Ivan Davydov characterizes as “bread
and rockets.” That is because ever more
Russians have come to recognize that the rockets are eating into their bread
and leaving them less well off.
And the second concerns a revision
in Russians’ understanding of what it means to be a great power. Prior to 2014,
Russians viewed the status of being a great power exclusively in terms of
military might. Now, ever more of them feel
that being a great power means having a population with a high standard of
living. That too works against Putin.
It appears, Shtepa suggests, that
today “we are observing a certain repetition of the history of the start of the
20th century. In 1914 … imperial and militarist attitudes were widespread
and support for the tsar high. But less than three years later, the compass
shifted – and those very same people came into the streets demanding the
overthrow of the autocracy.”
No comments:
Post a Comment