Paul Goble
Staunton,
January 22 – In what may set the stage for new protests like those which have roiled
Ingushetia since the end of September 2018, Chechnya’s Ramzan Kadyrov is
seeking to acquire for his republic territory now within Daghestan, something
Daghestan head Vladimir Vasiliyev appears prepared to grant.
In early
December, the two men announced that they would be discussing the border
between the two republics given the significant Chechen population now with
Daghestan that would like to be part of Chechnya. At that time, Vasiliyev
promised to take their desires into consideration (kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/330614/).
Now, Vasiliyev has gone further. In
a January 20 interview with NNT disseminated on YouTube, the Makhachkala leader
said that he was quite prepared to listen to those in border areas who wanted
to change the borders. Asked whether he
would allow a referendum on this, he didn’t exclude that possibility (youtube.com/watch?v=SUPbQboMS20).
Daghestanis have expressed their
outrage that Vasiliyev did not reject such a possibility out of hand,
especially since during the fall Kadyrov showed his sympathies for Daghestan’s
nearly 100,000 Chechens and their desires to unite their territory in the
northwest of that republic with Chechnya.
Daghestanis are especially outraged,
it appears, because of what happened with Ingushetia where Ingushetia’s
Yunus-Bek Yevkurov agreed to hand over large portions of his republic to Kadyrov
without any open discussion or referendum, an action that has led to protests
there since that time.
There are important reasons,
however, why Daghestan will not be able to reach an accord like the one Kadyrov
did with Yevkurov and why a massive negative reaction would be less likely than
it was in Ingushetia.
On the one hand, as the Russian
Constitutional Court held, the executive agreement between Yevkurov and Kadyrov
was legitimate only because no border had been demarcated between the two
republics up to that point. Russian law only requires a referendum if federal
subjects want to change borders rather than establish one.
The border between Chechnya and Daghestan,
in contrast to the one between Chechnya and Daghestan, has long been demarcated
and accepted. If Moscow were to back Kadyrov on this move as it did in his move
against Ingushetia, it would have to ignore its own settled law. That seems
unlikely.
And on the other, while the Chechens
are a large community in Daghestan, they form only just over three percent of the
population and occupy only a slightly greater percentage of its territory.
Consequently, allowing them to leave with their land would not threaten Daghestan
because the loss of Chechens and their land would not significantly reduce the
republic, a sharp contrast to the situation in Ingushetia, the smallest,
non-urban federal subject in Russia.
No comments:
Post a Comment