Paul Goble
Staunton, January 20 – Many have
been shocked that only a third of Russians now trust Vladimir Putin, a record
low. But “if you analyze the results of this research,” Igor Eidman says, “it
becomes clear that the real rating of the president is lower still” because
many Russians are still afraid to tell pollsters what they really think.
This becomes clear, the Russian
sociologist says, when one considers that the same poll which found that 33.4
percent of Russians “trust” Putin reported that 62.1 percent of them approved
of his activities. Thus, “about 30 percent don’t trust Putin but approve him” (facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=2213484578714509&id=100001589654713).
“How can anyone approve someone he
doesn’t trust?” Eidman asks rhetorically. “This is not some strange Russian
phenomenon or schizophrenia as it might appear to be on first glance.” Instead,
it reflects the fact that “many Russians simply are afraid to speak the truth
when answering the questions of sociologists.”
In this particular poll, he
continues, “the question about approval was closed – one had to choose from
proposed answers – but the one about trust to politicians was open – one had to
offer an answer oneself.” When answers are offered, Russians choose the one
they think their interlocutor wants to hear; when they aren’t, they are more
likely to offer their own views.
As a result,
Eidman says, the sociologists obtained the results they did, with trust “essentially
lower than approval.” Of course, he continues,
“ratings of politicians are always lower when open questions are used than when
closed are.” In the Russian case, this has nothing to do with memory loss: it has
to do with fear of speaking the truth about the top man.
“The level of fear varies among various
categories of respondents,” he says. But
a reasonable allocation of those who say they approve but don’t trust means that
“the real trust rating of Putin may be about 20 to 25 percent,” certainly not
higher. And this level of trust means two important things.
On the one hand, Eidman says, it
means that “the protest potential of society is quite high; and on the other,
it indicates that “Putin would lose any free elections” should they ever be
held in Russia.
No comments:
Post a Comment