Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 16 – Most people see
annexation as something that occurs once and for all at a particular time; but
in fact, it can be a creeping process in which one country gradually takes over
another which like the frog in warming water doesn’t recognize what has
happened until too late – and that is exactly what is happening in Belarus
today, Rasa Juknevičienė says.
The
former Lithuanian defense minister who is now deputy chairman of her country’s
parliamentary committee on national security says it is critically important to
understand annexation as a process rather than a one-time event if one is to
have any chance of blocking it (belsat.eu/ru/news/eks-ministr-oborony-litvy-anneksiya-belarusi-uzhe-idet-lukashenko-neset-otvetstvennost/).
Moreover, she suggests, Putin has a
model from the Soviet past. During the Cold War, the USSR occupied Eastern
Europe and reduced the sovereignty of the countries in its bloc to the point
that it could use them for various purposes. They weren’t annexed formally, but
they were not fully sovereign either.
“I very well remember those times
when I was still young,” Juknevičienė continues. “I grew up in the Soviet Union,
in occupied Lithuania, and we understand what role satellite states like Poland
and the others who were supposedly sovereign states played in international platforms.
They were simply used by the Soviet Union.”
One is compelled now to ask whether
it is possible that Alyaksandr Lukashenka has in his hand a sufficient dollop
of sovereignty to redirect the situation toward Belarusian interests and not the
interests of the Kremlin,” Juknevičienė says.
If she had to give a “yes” or “no” answer, she continues, she would say “’no
‘it is already late.”
“But all the same, somewhere in the depth
of my heart, I hope or want to hope that sometime at night your president will
wake after a dream in which he will see the future of Belarus not in the
Kremlin’s embrace. He will see Belarus on the map of Europe together with democratic
countries.”
One hopes that will happen, but
Lukashenka’s actions increasingly are coordinated with Russia’s in ways that
suggest otherwise – and that is a serious matter for Lithuanians. “We do not
want new iron curtains with this people, but unfortunately they are now being
built and built via the militarization of Belarus.”
A Russian annexation of Belarus is
taking place, not yet juridical but political, Juknevičienė says; “and Alyaksandr
Lukahsenka bears responsibility for the fact that Belarus is only formally a state on the map of Europe.” (emphasis
supplied) In reality, she strongly implies, it is already no more an
independent state that Moscow’s satellites in the Cold War were.
It didn’t have to be this way, she
suggests, and notes that for a long time already she has said that “Belarus is
not the last dictatorship in Europe. After the annexation of Crimea, I think,
everyone should have seen that the very greatest threat from autocratic,
dictatorial, and mafia, if you like regimes is in the Kremlin.”
That is not to minimize the
suffering of the Belarusian people under Lukashenka. He has much to answer
for. But she concludes, she bases her
approach on the idea that “perhaps we can try to show Lukashenka an alternative
if it is not too late. But everything now depends precisely on him.”
No comments:
Post a Comment