Paul
Goble
Staunton, July 3 – Russians who
lived much of their lives in Soviet times suffered many traumas which continue
to affect them and their interactions with members of the next generation who
often don’t understand the sources of their reactions to what is going on now,
according to journalist Sergey Kuznetsov.
“For many people of the older
generation,” he writes, “any promise of a bright future or talk that people
will miraculously change works like the strongest of triggers,” given that in
Soviet times efforts to make good on such promises led to disaster (newizv.ru/article/general/03-07-2020/rozhdennye-v-sssr-kakie-istoricheskie-travmy-nesut-s-soboy-byvshie-sovetskie-lyudi).
The last time many of that
generation believed that a miraculous transformation in a short time was
possible, itself a product of Soviet experience, was the 1990s; and the failure
of that effort only reinforced the sense among older people that any such
promise carries with it the seeds of disaster for a all involved.
And when younger people defend the
1990s and say that of course there were some negative side effects, what older
Russians here is the Stalinist line that when trees are chopped down, the chips
will fly and the picture of the world that flowed from that observation springs
to mind.
But that is far from the only trauma
Soviet times inflicted on Russians and that defines how they react to
discussions now. The Soviet system claimed the right to intervene in all
personal matters, including sexual ones, and thus older people perhaps
unexpectedly to some see such calls now as opening the way to disaster.
Freedom of speech was not respected
in Soviet times and what one read or said could have serious negative
consequences. When people today say “we don’t need such literature” and call
for its exclusion, what many older Russians hear is a call for the return to
that past and its horrors.
And the experience of Jews in Soviet
times has disposed many older Russians to be suspicious of both negative and
positive discrimination, convinced that the latter in which some are given
advantages because of past mistreatment will inevitably entail the putting in
place of the former.
“Russian people who lived a large
part of their lives in the 20th century thus have as an inheritance
from this century many traumas,” the journalist says. “These traumas to this
day define their view on life and values. They cause them to feel a strong
fear, masked as anger, suspicion, cynicism, and so on”
“Encountering this, one must understand
that most often behind these emotions is a trauma.” That needs to be understood
in order to make possible a genuine conversation across generational lines.
Russians of all ages simply need to recognize this most unfortunate survival of
the past.
“Russia and its residents have an enormous
and quite unique set of historical traumas, common for all Europeans in the 20th
century and common for all residents of the USSR (plus differences for
different peoples including Russians). One has no choice but to take this into
consideration.”
Three things make Kuznetsov’s observations
especially important. First, it makes clear that the reactions to current developments
that are often said to be limited to the generation of the 1960s are in fact
part of a larger reaction of people who were not part of that generation but
rather all those who came of age in Soviet times.
Second, it explains why support for the
radical transformations of the 1990s was initially so great and then
disintegrated so quickly. In Soviet times, people had no choice but to continue
to act as if they believed in what they had been promised. When after 1991,
that compulsion disappeared, they turned away as soon as it became clear the
transformation wasn’t taking place.
And third – and perhaps most important –
it explains the suspicion many older Russians have to any promises about a
bright future and thus why political leaders like Vladimir Putin don’t
articulate an ideology. They know on their own skins that such promises will be
rejected and thus it is better not to make them.
No comments:
Post a Comment