Paul
Goble
Staunton, November 30 – Seventy-seven
years ago, Soviet forces invaded Finland, forcing Helsinki to give up part of
its territory and to adopt the policy of not offending Moscow known as “Finlandization.”
But thanks to the heroism of the Finnish army and people, Finland remained an
independent country rather than becoming the Soviet republic Stalin had
planned.
Now, given Russian aggression in
Ukraine, Finns are simultaneously trying to avoid provoking Vladimir Putin
while building up their own national defenses, expanding ties with the West, and
considering NATO membership, according to Kyiv commentator Anatoly Shara (apostrophe.ua/article/world/europe/2016-11-30/nacheku-finlyandiya-opasaetsya-povtoreniya-ukrainskogo-stsenariya/8589).
For Finns, the Winter War remains
the defining event of their national life in the 20th century, a
continuing reminder of the threat Russia poses to their country, of the need
for caution in dealing with Moscow, and of the ways in which they were able by
dint of hard fighting to prevent Stalin from annexing it to the Soviet Union.
Having experienced Soviet
aggression, the Finns “from the very beginning” have supported Ukraine in the
face of Putin’s aggression against it, Shara says. Already on March 1, 2014,
the Finnish foreign minister was “one of the first” to sharply denounce Moscow’s Anschluss of Ukraine’s Crimea.
Helsinki has supported sanctions
against Moscow and called for the imposition of even harsher measures to force
Russia to pull back from its aggression. On September 21, Finnish President
Sauli Niinisto at the UN General Assembly reaffirmed Helsiniki’s support for
Ukraine and its condemnation of Russia for its aggression.
Finnish
foreign policy experts, Shara says, “consider that the events in Ukraine are
only the beginning” of a much broader Russian campaign to recover its status as
a super power. Kristi Raik of the
Finnish Institute of International Affairs says that Moscow will do everything
it can to split the West because the West is “the chief obstacle” to Putin’s
ambitions.
Finns understand that “in the case
of aggression,” their country can count only on its own resources; and since Moscow’s
Anschluss of Ukraine’s Crimea, they have increased their military readiness by
staging constant exercises and increased cooperation with West, even allowing
NATO for the first time to conduct maneuvers on Finnish territory.
Moscow has been infuriated by that
and has taken its base near Alkurtturi out of mothballs and begun the
reconstitution of a mechanized brigade as well as seeking to use the energy weapon
more frequently against the Finns. That has led to a dramatic cooling in
bilateral relations as shown when Finns protested against Russia’s policies
during Putin’s June visit.
Moscow has been especially angry
about indications that an increasing number of Finns favor joining NATO,
although polls suggest that the majority of them favor avoiding that step lest
it by itself provoke Russia into
military action and back instead improving their own national defenses. And
most believe they could join only if Sweden does at the same time.
Finnish experts for their part are “certain,”
Shara continues, that were Finnland to seek to join NATO, Moscow would “sooner
or later” repeat “a Ukrainian scenario” there. Earlier this month, officials
noted that Moscow is already taking steps in that direction by having Russians
buy property in eastern Finland (apostrophe.ua/news/world/2016-11-01/v-es-zametili-podozritelnyie-voennyie-deystviya-lyudey-putina/75844).
Raik
says that Finland seeks to maintain a dialogue with Moscow even as it retains
its tough position of condemning Russian actions in Ukraine. How long it can do that, of course, depends
not only on the resolve of the Finns but on changes in Europe as a whole where
Russian “hybrid methods” are being deployed across the board.
No comments:
Post a Comment