Paul Goble
Staunton,
November 19 – In an article for Kazan’s “Business Gazeta” today, Viktor Minin
says that he is “certain that already in the course of the past year direct and
serious negotiations have been going on between the teams of the present
Russian leader and the newly-elected US president” (business-gazeta.ru/article/329168).
Their
conversations, the Russian commentator argues, reflect the reality that “Putin
and Trump are objective allies at the current historical stage” and that the
Kremlin leader feared that in the event of a Hillary Clinton victory in the
American elections, he might face an effort by groups inside Russia to
overthrow him and his regime.
Indeed,
Minin argues the recent arrest of Aleksey Ulyukayev reflects both Putin’s
desire to undermine any challenge to his rule and his plans to radically change
the Russian political system as the world around the Russian Federation changes
to one more favorable to Moscow’s position.
Putin
also wants to change the system within Russia but to do so in ways that will
not frighten either the population or the elites, and consequently, the
commentator continues, he will “call on their patriotism and try not to sow
fear and panic … Therefore, the mass repressions which all expect (a new 1937)
will not occur,” but the current arrangements will change.
All
this reflects not the desires and calculations of any one individual or group
of individuals but rather tectonic shifts in Russia and the world. Minin says that “a certain large historical
stage of our civilization has ended” just as the USSR ended because it “completely
exhausted its energy and people lost faith in it.”
That
is true in Russia and it is true in the US, he says. “Americans, above all
white Americans have come to understand that Russia, first of all, is not their
enemy and second that America is not the first or only center of power in the
world but rather one of three.” It is stronger than Russia and China but cannot
function without acknowledging their status.
This
means, Minin says, that “Trump, Putin ad china are serving the objective
process of a change of the rules of the game and a change of elites on the planet.” When each of the three is able to recognize
the power of the other two, he suggests, “then there will be as in the Bible, ‘a
new heaven and a new earth.’”
Liberals
in all three plays were not able to win out despite their advantages. They “weren’t
able to provoke a major war.” For that they
needed to replace Putin and thus “complete via globalization a new system of
world colonialism.” But the resistance
of the population made this absolutely impossible. That is what Trump
understood and why he won, Minin says.
“I
am certain,” he continues, that close aides of Putin and Trump have been
talking with each other “already a minimum of a year,” something that helps
explain Hillary Clinton’s attacks even though she did not provide any evidence
that this was going on.
As
a result, Putin and Trump and their subordinates are ever more “synchronous.”
Each perfectly well understands that they are strategic partners. Each understands
his tasks. Trump his, and Putin his. The
American president elect understands that Russia is not opposed to the US; it
simply has escaped from under US management.”
That
means there will not be war between them but rather “a rapid rapprochement with
America. Of course, for Trump, this
rapprochement will require him to ensure that Washington follows him and no one
else and that when others do things, his partner in Moscow not fall into any
confusion as to what matters.
To
that end, Minin suggests, Trump will act “in parallel with Putin” and “change
the ruling elite of the US. But at the first stage, he will use not retirements
and arrests but the natural change of command connected with a change in the
presidency. [But] in succeeding stages, he too will have to change the
Constitution and laws” to get rid of those who don’t agree.
Minin
does not provide any evidence for his claim, but it is nonetheless a disturbing
indicator of how some in Putin’s Russia see things and may help guide their
reaction to what is now taking place in the US. If indeed his words serve that
role, the path ahead could be far more dangerous than he appears to believe.
No comments:
Post a Comment