Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 15 – Even though the
Free Russia Forum in Lithuania passed over in silence an appeal from the
Tatarstan government in exile for recognition or their republic’s independence
(windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2019/06/free-russia-forum-passes-over-appeal.html),
many participants had more positive reactions.
Ramazan Alpaut of the IdelReal
portal which tracks developments in the Middle Volga, took part in the meeting
and met with a number of the Forum participants. He has now provided a summary of their
comments which helps to put the meeting’s inaction in context and to suggest
future strategies (idelreal.org/a/29999838.html).
Daniil
Konstantinov, a leader of the Russian European Movement and member of the Forum’s
permanent committee, said that the Forum did not have the authority to recognize
or not recognize the independence of a region or republic. It did, however, put
the appeal on its website for comment.
Some
supported it, others opposed it, but the delegates clearly felt, he continued,
that they did not have sufficient information or authority to make a decision, Konstantinov
said. We simply don’t know what the people of Tatarstan think, he continued. As
for himself, he said he favors the preservation and development of federalism
in Russia.
Igor
Yakovenko, the former secretary of the Union of
Russian Journalists and a commentator who has taken part in Forum
meetings since the beginning, said that the people of various republics and
regions must make the decision about whether to be independent or remain part
of Russia.
“I
think,” he said, “that after the Putin empire will be destroyed, all its
component parts must take a decision whether to continue to live in this single
state or try to establish their own statehood.” Each of those decisions must be
taken independently. Calling for this or that independent state from the outside
would be “quite strange,” Yakovenko said.
In
addition, Yakovenko said, there is the question of “independence from whom?”
The peoples of the country need independence “above all from their own
authorities” who are every bit as much “colonizers” as Moscow is. He added that
he favors “the transformation of the Russian empire into a large number of
independent states.”
The
reason for that, he continued, is simple.
“The preservation of the Russian state in its current borders will inevitably
lead to the restoration of the imperial syndrome, even if in place of the Russian
empire there arises let us say, ‘the beautiful Russia of the future’ which
Aleksey Navalny has outlined.” The imperial temptation will remain “enormous.”
And
Aleksandr Morozov, a political scientist who also took part in the Forum, said
that the appeal by the Tatarstan government in exile was “completely justified.” But while such groups, just like the Crimean
Tatars, are correct in making such appeals, the Forum is equally justified in
not coming out in support of them. That
isn’t its proper role.
To
do so would be to exceed the Forum’s authority, but at the same time, he
continued, the Forum needs to invite more representatives of the regions and
republics to its future meetings. At the first meetings of the Forum, regional
and national questions were discussed actively. That approach needs to be
restored.
No comments:
Post a Comment