Paul
Goble
Staunton, August 15 – The Ingush
Supreme Court today will hear an appeal by opposition deputies against an April
2 decision of the Magas District Court which approved the law former republic
head Yunus-Bek Yevkurov pushed through to approve his September 2018 border
deal with Chechnya’s Ramzan Kadyrov.
The Ingush Constitution specifies
that any major decision like changing the republic’s borders must be subject to
a referendum, but Yevkurov, knowing he couldn’t win such a vote without massive
falsifications, forced the republic’s Popular Assembly to pass a law giving it
the right to approve the measure, something it subsequently did.
Opposition figures are challenging
the law not only on constitutional grounds but procedural ones as well: They
argue that fewer than eight of the 32 deputies voted for Yevkurov’s measure,
far too few to approve it under the law (fortanga.org/2019/08/byt-s-narodom-priznaet-li-verhovnyj-sud-ingushetii-nezakonnym-soglashenie-evkurova-kadyrova/).
The Supreme Court’s decision will
have significant consequences. If it overturns the lower court, that will set
the stage either for overturning the agreement or for a referendum; if it doesn’t,
more opposition protests are almost certain with the Ingush people again
demanding that the republic government live according to the constitution and
laws.
Meanwhile, there were two events in
Moscow with Ingush implications. On the one hand, siloviki raided the office of
the Legal Initiative, a group which since 2000 has helped track down those who
have disappeared or suffered from torture in the North Caucasus, including in
Ingushetia (kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/339105/).
And on the other, the biological mother
is seeking to reclaim her daughter who was tortured apparently by her former
husband’s sister with whom the girl had been living and has demanded that human
rights groups pay for her travel to Moscow where her daughter remains in
hospital after the amputation of her hand (capost.media/news/zdorove/mat-izbitoy-v-ingushetii-aishi-azhigovoy-potrebovala-oplatit-ey-bilety/).
The case has
attracted widespread attention in the Russian capital because of its horrific details
and in the North Caucasus because traditional law there typically requires that
in the event of a divorce, children be given to the husband or his relatives
rather than remain with the mother.
No comments:
Post a Comment