Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 28 – Officials in
three self-proclaimed statelets formed as a result of Russian military action, South
Ossetia, the Donetsk Peoples Republic, and the Luhansk Peoples Republic, have
decided to do what many in Russia want, returning Stalin-era names to cities for
several days a year on holidays associated with World War II.
This “restoration of Soviet name is
temporary and symbolic, for just three days a year, [but] nevertheless, it has
already generated stormy arguments and angry protests,” Vzglyad journalists Andrey
Rezchikov and Mikhail Moshkin say, with enthusiastic backers squared off
against horrified opponents (vz.ru/society/2020/4/29/1036752.html).
South Ossetian President Anatoly
Bibilov not long ago decreed that his republic’s capital, Tsinkhval
(Georgian, Tsinkhvali) will be called by
its Stalin-era name Stalinir three days a year, on the day of the city, Victory
Day, and the anniversary of the beginning of the Great Fatherland War. That was
the city’s name from 1934 until 1961.
Georgian officials have denounced
this move, declaring that “people are becoming victims of an absurd experiment
when they are being forcibly returned to the Soviet past. But South Ossetian
ones say that this is simply a symbolically important step to remind people of
the events of the war years.
South Ossetia is simply following
the decisions in the LNR and DNR, the Moscow journalists say. In the first, as
announced last week, Luhansk will take its earlier name Voroshilovgrad three
days a year, to keep memories alive and to encourage young people to learn about
the glorious past of their city.
And in the second, Donetsk will be
given its old name, Stalino, three days a year, Victory Day, the anniversary of
the beginning of the war, and the day of the liberation of the Donbass from the
Nazis. Officials there too believe this will lead young people to “turn to Google”
to find out about the past of their city and region.
The idea of restoring either
temporarily or permanently Stalin-era names comes from Russia, but there has
been less success in moving in that direction, Rezchikov and Moshkin say. There
have been debates about returning the name Stalingrad to Volgograd since 2014
but they haven’t gone anywhere.
What they have done is generate
sharp opposition. Political commentator Nikolay Svanidze says that “if
residents of these cities will be pleased to have their city called by the name
of a mass murderer, let them.” But they and others need to know that this
individual was responsible for more Soviet deaths than the Nazis.
But others like the idea. Political writer Anatoly Vasserman says that
he doesn’t see any reason why “many other cities of Russia renamed at various
times and for various reasons could not follow this practice” of going back to
Stalin-era names, at the very least for two or three days a year.
No comments:
Post a Comment