Paul
Goble
Staunton, May 30 – In tsarist times,
the three main Slavic groups in the population were called the Great Russians (Velikorossy),
the Little Russians (Malorossy), and the White Russians (Belorussy).
Now, some ethnic Russian activists are calling for a restoration of the use of
Velikorossy as a term of identity in the 2020 census and beyond.
They are basing their calls on
Vladimir Putin’s insistence that today’s Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians
are not three nations but one, but by advancing this demand, such people are
unintentionally highlighting the extent to which Russian identity in its current
form reflects in large measure not a thousand-year history but the policies of the
Soviet state.
It was, after all, the Soviet
government and not any national movement that defined those who had called
themselves and been called Great Russians as simply Russians to avoid offending
the other two groups and to prevent such pretensions of Russian superiority
over them from provoking an explosive negative reaction.
Svobodnaya pressa commentator
Veniamin Bashlachev recounts the history of the names Great Russian and Russian
and argues that the fate of a people depends on the name it gives itself and
demands that others give it as well and suggests that ever more people in
Russia are recognizing that reality (svpressa.ru/blogs/article/266777/).
He
reports that on the internet there is now a page labelled “Velikoross. The
Truth Sounds Beautiful” and quotes from it the words of a woman from the Altai
who said that she had first read that word when she came upon it in a listing
of her ancestors at the end of imperial times. “Imagine,” she said, “I am the descendant
of my grandfather: I am a GREAT RUSSIAN.”
According
to Bashlachev, she has ever reason for delight and pride because “at the beginning
of the 20th century, the Great Russians were the most numerous and
must significant people of Russia.” But
the Bolsheviks took that away from them because they followed the anti-Russian
arguments of Karl Marx.
His
doctrine required that they “deprive” Great Russians of their ancestors by
renaming them Russians. “They banned Vladimir Dal’s “Great Dictionary of the
Living Great Russian Langauge” and the word “Great Russians.” And they
introduced instead the adjective “Russians.”
This
“beyond any doubt was a crime against historic Russia because the liquidation
of the name ‘Great Russian’ automatically ‘zeroed out’ all the centuries of
achievements of the ancestors of the Great Russians. Whether you like it or
not, in the 1920s, a course was set toward the disappearance of the Great
Russians as a people.”
Many
at the time opposed this, but their leaders were deported. Among those sent out
of Russia was Aleksandr Ilin, “the outstanding Russian thinking whom Putin
recalls today,” Bashlachev continues. He
saw the danger of giving all the other peoples of Russia a real name but
reducing Russians to the status of an adjective.
“Any
real people has a noun as its name. A people exists as long as there is a
desire to preserve its name,” the commentator says. Otherwise, it first becomes
a mankurt who forgets its past and then ceases to exist and is absorbed by
others who have not forgotten their names and their pasts.
There
are signs that this is happening to those who now call themselves Russians,
Bashlachev says. He recently encountered on the Internet a post by one of these
which shockingly declared that “everything would be easier for everyone on
earth if the Russian nation were to cease to exist.”
“That
is what is happening with us, with Russians.” And it must be fought, Bashlachev
argues. “Ahead of us is the 2020 census. In order to increase the capacity of
Russian people to resist … people must remind census takers that you are
descendants of the Great Russians who extended Russia from the White Sea to the
Black Sea and from the Baltic to the Pacific.”
According
to the commentator, today’s Russians “have become accustomed since childhood to
think they are Russians. Therefore, now, only a few thousand consider themselves
Great Russians.” That number must rise to at least a million so that the
Kremlin will “finally see the light and official return Great Russians the
status of indigenous residents of Russia.”
No comments:
Post a Comment