Paul
Goble
Staunton, May 20 – Vladimir Putin
wants to make the number of hours of Russian-language instruction in Russian
schools inviolable, something that will mean non-Russian parents will be able
to secure instruction in their native languages only by sacrificing other
programs and thus putting the future academic and professional careers of their
children at risk.
Such an approach, announced by the
Kremlin leader yesterday at a joint session of the Council of Inter-National
Relations and the Council on the Russian Language, can be expected to find
enthusiastic support from Russian nationalists and be viewed as “ethnically
neutral” by many observers abroad.
But its consequences for
non-Russians are likely to be severe, reducing still further the number of
languages in which their children can receive instruction in their native
languages and the number of hours devoted to them and sparking outrage and
protests among many of these groups who view the defense of their language as a
key part of the defense of their nation.
Putin said many things his defenders
will use to deny what the obvious thrust of his words. Thus, he told the group every
nation had the right to its own language, that violating that will lead to
problems, and that moves forward must not harm Russian or non-Russian languages
(nazaccent.ru/content/16073-putin-problema-v-obuchenii-nacionalnym-yazykam.html).
But
no one should be misled. First, the Kremlin leader explicitly said “the state
must constantly raise the quality of instruction of Russian for pupils
regardless of their place of residence or specialization” and that Russian must
become a separate self-standing category subject rather than being part, as it
is now, of a “language and literature” one (stoletie.ru/na_pervuiu_polosu/vladimir_putin_jedinstvo_strany_napramuju_zavisit_ot_znanija_russkogo_jazyka_509.htm).
If
that happens, it would mean that non-Russian children could only gain access to
more hours of instruction in their native language by cutting hours on other,
non-language subjects, something that was never true even in the harshest
Soviet times. As Putin noted, “the education ministry will ensure that the
number of hours in Russia will nowhere be reduced.”
Two of Putin’s other comments provide
additional evidence of where he is going. On the one hand, he insists that 96
percent of all Russian Federation residents speak Russian, a figure that
includes many who speak another language as their first and would like to have
more instruction in that language.
And on the other, Putin pointed to
the situation in Russian occupied Crimea where he said three languages –
Russian, Ukrainian, and Crimean Tatar – have equal rights, an assertion with
which no independent observer of what is occurring there with the attacks on
Ukrainian and especially Crimean Tatar languages would concur.
At present, Putin continued,
instruction in Russian Federation schools is conducted in 30 languages,
although he did not mention that in most of the non-Russian 29 this instruction
is severely restricted in hours and to the lower grades; and he said that
courses were available in 89 languages, including many foreign languages.
Putin’s Russian first approach was
also underscored by his expressions of concern about lexical borrowings in
Russian, something that many Russian nationalists are especially upset about.
As in his other comments, Putin sought to portray himself as concerned about
this but at the same time unprepared to be draconian as yet in doing anything
ab out it.
One detail of yesterday’s meeting is
especially important. It was supposed to take place on February 6 but was
delayed because of the visit to Moscow of French President Francois Hollande
and German Chancellor Angela Merkel who had come to discuss the situation in
Ukraine.
A Putin aide suggested that the
delay gave “specialists” additional time to “better prepare for the meeting.”
That may be true, but what is certainly the case is that it gave those pushing
for the expanded use of Russian and the imposition of new limits on non-Russian
to express their views and in a very public manner.
Last week, for example, Russian
activists in Tatarstan, Bashkortostan, Buryatia and Komi complained in an open
letter to Putin that pupils in their republics were not being allowed to study
Russian as their native language and called on him to do something to protect
the Russian nation (kazan.mk.ru/articles/2015/05/14/putina-prosyat-spasti-russkiy-yazyk-v-nacionalnykh-respublikakh-rossii.html).
And Russian commentators like
Mikhail Delyagin of the Moscow Institute for the Problems of Globalization had
time to claim that forcing Russian speaking children to study local languages
in the national republics was promoting ethnic friction. Naturally, he said
nothing about non-Russians being forced to study Russian (sibpower.com/novosti-regionov/ruskii-mir-dolzhen-byt-nairusneishim.html).
Such
statements, of course, allow Putin and his entourage to present themselves as
responding to the popular will; and Russian nationalists are already
celebrating what the Kremlin leader has done as “a serious step in the defense
of Russian” and proposing additional steps as well (ruskline.ru/news_rl/2015/05/20/eto_sereznyj_shag_v_storonu_zawity_russkogo_yazyka/).
Non-Russians
are likely to respond in the coming days and weeks, and their views about what
Putin is about are likely to be very different than those of the Russian
president and his Russian nationalist supporters.
No comments:
Post a Comment