Paul
Goble
Staunton, May 19 – Valeriya Novodvorskaya
and Galina Starovoitova, the symbols of Russian liberalism after the death of
Academician Andrey Sakharov, would have been 65 and 69 this week were they
still alive. But tragically, Yevgeny Ikhlov writes, the two who shared a birthday
passed from the scene when it became “completely clear that their mission had
failed.”
Starovoitova was killed when Russian
political life had been transformed into something horrific, the Moscow
commentator say, and Novodvorskaya died when “free and sovereign Russia had
become ever more fascist and aggressive. They thus should be remembered not
only for what they did but for what their deaths mean (kasparov.ru/material.php?id=5559FF3621941).
Despite
all their differences, the two began their political careers at almost exactly
the same time. In February 1988, Starovoitova, a Moscow ethnographer, declared
her support for the Armenians of Karabakh and became “a heroine of the Armenian
people” much in the same way that General Grigorenko had become a hero of the
Crimean Tatars.
Less
than three months later, Novodvorskaya, a Soviet dissident, pushed Sergey
Grigoryants to create a poly-ideological opposition party, the Democratic
Union, which, as Ikhlov points out, was “to become the incubator of a
multi-party Russian democracy. Not surprisingly, the powers that be were not
happy with either of them.
Ikhlov
concludes that Starovoitova and Novodvorskaya “symbolized the two poles of
Russian liberalism and Russian Westernism.” Indeed, “after the death of
Academician Sakharov, it was precisely they who carried forward the two banners
of democratic intellectual militance. And they fell, without laying down their
arms. Each in her own battle.”
No comments:
Post a Comment