Paul Goble
Staunton,
July 22 – There are more than 3500 veterans of the Soviet war in Afghanistan –
the so-called “Afgantsy” -- and some in Riga view them as a potential threat to
the security of that NATO member country both because of their military
experience and because of their own efforts to remain a unified force.
Last month, Russian commentator Vyacheslav
Samoylov points out in an essay on the Stoletiye portal, the Latvian Security
Police blocked a meeting of Afghan veterans in Yelgava that their former
comrades in arms from Estonia, Lithuania and Belarus were planning to attend (stoletie.ru/zarubejie/_afganskij_sindrom_rigi_918.htm).
That
action, one motivated by Riga’s concerns about the possibility that such groups
pose a security threat to the Latvian state, has attracted the attention of
Russians in Tallinn and Moscow and prompted Samoylov to look into the matter
and especially to examine a recent Latvian commentary on the Afgantsy of that
country.
In
April, he writes, Janis Lasmanis, a columnist for Riga’s Latvian daily, “Neatkarīgā Rīta Avīze,”
laid out in some detail why Latvian officials are concerned about what the
Afgantsy may do and called for Riga to take more serious steps to restrict
their activities. The ban on the June meeting appears to be in response to such
concerns.
According to Lasmanis, “After the
beginning of the conflict in Ukraine, organizations registered in Latvia of
veterans of various [Soviet] became the subjects of intense interest by the organs
of state security. There are concerns
that under the cover of these structures, the ground is being prepared [for
them to] assist in the dissemination of ideas unfriendly to Latvia.”
Even more, the Latvian writer
suggested, “communities of Soviet veterans of the force structures” can “become
an instrument for the dissemination of influence, force and control by the
Kremlin.”
Riga earlier this year blocked a
visit to Latvia by Gennady Shorokhov, vice president of the All-Russian
Veterans Organization, “the Military Brotherhood,” because that group was known
to have been involved with the recruitment of fighters for the pro-Moscow
militias in the Donbass.
Shorokhov wanted to link up in
Latvia with AKVA, the Association of Afghan War Veterans Living in Latvia,
Lasmanis wrote. “According to unofficial information, there has been a
longstanding struggle between its moderate members and the leadership” which is
far more radically pro-Moscow.
Most of the members, he continued, “do not
want that the organization actively participate in Kremlin activities; but the
current leadership views itself and AKVA as the advance “’soft force’” of the Russian
leadership. As such, it works against Latvia’s democratic political system.
According
to Samoylov, the Afgantsy in Latvia have many reasonable grievances. “You
wouldn’t call their life especially enviable,” he says. AKVA’s leader Adu Aduyev complains that the
Latvian government does not recognize their service in calculating pensions or
even recognize their special needs as a distinct group.
In
particular, Aduyev has said, “there is no medical service” specially designed
for these veterans even though many suffer from “the so-called ‘Afghan syndrome.’” “We are not asking anything supernatural for
ourselves,” he continued. “We simply want that the government and the
parliament direct their attention to our needs.”
That
is something the Latvian authorities have not done, Samoylov says; and it is
clear from his commentary today that at least some in Moscow are thinking about
how they might exploit a group in a neighboring country that is unhappy with
its situation and whose members have experience in combat.
No comments:
Post a Comment