Paul
Goble
Staunton, February 20 – The responses
of US President Donald Trump to the school shooting in Florida and Russian President
Vladimir Putin to the shooting in the Daghestani church are remarkably similar
in one way but distinct in another, a reflection of similar impulses in
dissimilar situations, Dmitry Bykov says.
In a commentary for Sobesednik, the Moscow commentator notes
that “Trump continues to follow the Putin path: he as he has in the past used
national tragedies for the strengthening of his own power and an occasion to
insist on his own innocence” (sobesednik.ru/dmitriy-bykov/20180219-dmitrij-bykov-tramputin).
But precisely because Americans have
seen this so many times before, they quickly put it in context and are far less
impressed with Trump’s argument that the FBI could have prevented the school
shooting if it had not been distracted by what Trump continues to call “the
fake news” of Russian meddling in US elections.
The Americans react to what Trump
says much as they might to the behavior of an exotic animal suddenly transplanted
into their midst, Bykov continues. And that is the source of the difference
between Trump and Putin in this case: Russians haven’t responded that way to their
leaders since the end of the 1980s.
This leads to another “principled
difference” between Trump and Putin. “Trump curses the special services for the
fact that they have concentrated on an invented foreign threat and missed a
domestic one.” But for Russians, that is “unthinkable” because for them no
domestic problem or even all of them taken together “outweighs any single
foreign one.”
The Russian special services under
Putin have as their priority “the investigation of foreign threats and
influences. Domestic psychopaths can shoot as they want in the country’s schools.
The problems,” in the telling of Putin and his regime, “are only from the
outside.”
And consequently, if Trump were “a
true Putinist, he would have already said that [the shooter in Florida] had
been recruited by Kim Jong-un and acted with the assistance of traitors from
among the Democrats.”
No comments:
Post a Comment