Paul
Goble
Staunton, February 14 – Many people
assume that newspapers are dying because television and the Internet have reduced
their audience, the costs of newsprint and journalists keep going up, and the state
isn’t trying to drive them out of business, Maksim Bakulev writes. But in fact,
these “usual suspects” are proving lesser threats than three others.
In a commentary for Irkutsk’s Babr
news agency, the journalist says that the biggest threats come from the collapse
of the subscription system that existed in Soviet times, the failure of
advertisers to understand that they mustn’t dictate content, and rising prices
driven not by the costs of preparing the papers but by the greed of
distributors (babr24.com/irk/?IDE=170674).
The distribution system, he says, typically
charges three times as much for a paper at a kiosk than it cost to produce and
is both a monopoly in most cities – Irkutsk is lucky in that it has four
different distribution companies – and a criminal activity because distributors
don’t report their incomes and pay taxes on it.
Indeed, Bakulev says, his
observations suggest, gaining control of a distribution network provides higher
and safer returns even than selling illegal drugs or guns. One needn’t worry about the police, one can
lie about how much money one has collected, and those who want to buy newspapers
provide a ready supply of money, albeit one that will end if the papers do.
The government has failed to address
the problem of “distributor sharks,” something it could easily do by more frequent
inspections and by allowing a variety of outlets to sell newspapers. If the authorities
don’t do that, “the papers will die and the population will remain one-one-one
with TV’s First Channel.” That is Russia
in the 21st century, he says.
No comments:
Post a Comment