Paul
Goble
Staunton, February 18 – Although many
details are unknown or subject to intense dispute, Georgy Satarov says, it is
already obvious that what took place in Syria on the night of February 7-8
represents “the greatest shame of the Putin regime for all of the 18 years it
has been in power.”
There are currently two “main
questions” that Russians must face: how many victims were there among Russian
citizens and what kind of status did these Russians have, according to the
president of the INDEM Foundation. As everyone knows, there is an active
dispute about the first (blog.newsru.com/article/18feb2018/pozor).
Regarding the
second, Satarov says, “there are two versions.” The first is that the Russian
citizens involved were mercenaries, and the second is that they were members of
some branch of the Russian special forces operating under cover as
mercenaries. In terms of shame, of
course, there is no real difference.
In neither case can the Russian
government escape blame and in neither were these forces engaged in the supposed
“struggle with terrorism” or providing “help to the fraternal Syrian people. In
both cases, the authorities betrayed their own citizens and betrayed them in an
unprecedented manner.”
According to Satarov, the number of
Russian citizens killed is certainly higher than any Russian official will say,
possibly in “the hundreds” because if it were otherwise the US military would
now have been so restrained in its reporting.
Its “silence,” he says, “is part of an informal collusion with Russian
military and others … who assert that these were non-combatants.”
In Russia meanwhile, Satarov
continues, “some are silent but others are lying for an understandable reason.
Truth could destabilize the situation not only in Russia but lead to a gigantic
military catastrophe. Now a nervous Putin controls the nuclear button.” And how
he might react if he were compelled to face the truth “is unknown even to the
Most High.”
“Therefore,” the Moscow analyst says,
“you and I must pray for the silence of the one group and the lying of the other.
The time for a trial of the liars and thieves has still not come. One must be
patience. And one would not want that a
nuclear war interfere with this inevitable tribunal.”
Satarov concludes with the following
remark about shame: “This is not our shame. We did not select them, we did not
authorize anyone to begin a war beyond the borders of Russia or send
[mercenaries or troops] there. This is
the shame” of those who made those decisions, a shame that reflects their moral
bankruptcy.”
“Our shame,” the Moscow commentator
says, is elsewhere: it is that those people are “still in power.”
No comments:
Post a Comment