Paul
Goble
Staunton, February 12 – None of the
figures in what is coming to be known as the Rybka-Gate scandal comes off as
the brightest bulb in the box, but Oleg Deripaska, the oligarch at the center
of it, looks especially dim-witted, and that is prompting many Russians to ask
how could he be so rich if he is so completely lacking in outstanding
abilities.
Igor Eidman, a Russian commentator
for Deutsche Welle, says on his Facebook page that no one should be surprised
by Deripaska’s elevation: He conforms not to what people expect successes to
look like but to what the Putin regime, via a process of “negative selection,”
has elevated (facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1760157860713852&id=100001589654713).
“The social elite” of any country
can be formed by “individuals who do not have any outstanding positive
qualities,” the commentator says, although each system has “its own subjective
demands” that those hoping to rise to the top must meet. In some countries, one
thing is needed; “but in another a totally different” requirement is imposed.
“In one society, success in politics
or business requires above all entrepreneurial talent, creative abilities, and
eloquence. In others, it is given tot hose who can fit into the system, please
the bosses, and avoid attracting attention.”
And “in still a third, cruelty and decisiveness” and the ability to bend
others to one’s will.
According to Eidman, “the real
requirements … may often be quite different from the officially declared
notions about ‘what is good and what is bad.”
In Russia, for instance, “a unique selection of social selection has
been established” under Putin, one in which those hoping to rise need not
display any particular talents. They don’t need to be Elon Musks, but
Deripaskas.
As a result of this “negative”
selection, “the typical representative of the ruling Russian strata has the
world view of a huckster on the make, the esthetic tastes of a wealthy pimp, and
the moral principles of a pickpocket at a railroad station.” And people with
those qualities fit in the herd at the top of the current regime. One could hardly expect otherwise, Eidman
suggests.
A second Russian commentator,
journalist Sasha Sotnik, addresses the same issue but seeks to put it in an
even broader context. “All empires” from
Rome in classical times to the USSR a generation ago to Russia now, he argues, “before
their collapse drown in debauchery” (obozrevatel.com/abroad/vse-imperii-pered-razvalom-utopali-v-razvrate.htm).
No comments:
Post a Comment