Paul Goble
Staunton,
December 7 – Despite the decision by the Russian Constitutional Court, the
subsequent veto by the Ingush Electoral Commission on a referendum, and appeals
by republic officials to come to terms with the September 26 Ingush-Chechen
border accord, Ingush opponents say they will continue to protest and now plan
to appeal to international courts.
Ruslan
Mutsolgov, one of the protests, says that the Russian court’s decision “was taken
in favor of bureaucrats and destroys the federal structure of the country … As
a result of this decision, all regions of the country, including
Kabardino-Balkaria, Adygeya, Stavropol and Daghestan may suffer” (kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/328813/).
He says that opponents of the border
accord will make use of “all legal means” to have it reversed. “We reserve the
right to hold meetings and to appeal to international institutions.” His argument
is supported by Zakri Mamilov, a deputy of the Ingush legislature, who adds
that that body will support a referendum on the accord as required by the
Constitution.
And the Ingush deputy continues with
the observation that “the impression has been created that [the powers that be]
view Ingushetia as a second-class region. I personally am feeling a deep
spiritual disappointment.” His feelings almost certainly are shared by many
Ingush who live in one of the smallest federal subjects which is now to become
even smaller.
Three other developments over the
last 24 hours related to the Ingush-Chechen border dispute include:
Yunus-Bek
Kadyrov and Ramzan Kadyrov say that the decision of the Russian Constitutional
Court puts an end to the argument about the border accord. They add that they
will work together to develop the frontier area between them (kavkaz-uzel.eu/articles/328816/).
Ever
more commentators are suggesting that now that he had won in Ingushetia,
Chechnya’s Kadyrov will seek to annex territory in Daghestan as well (caucasustimes.com/ru/kavkaz-gotovjat-k-ukrupneniju/
and themoscowtimes.com/articles/ramzan-kadyrovs-next-target-op-ed-63745).
Russian
historian Daniil Kotsyubinsky says that the differing legal theories advanced
by the Russian Constitutional Court and by the Ingush Constitutional Court are
sufficiently compelling that the two sides will continue the fight in
Ingushetia and that that fight is likely to cause the Kremlin ever more
problems in the future (rosbalt.ru/posts/2018/12/07/1751732.html).
No comments:
Post a Comment