Paul
Goble
Staunton, January 10 – The possibility
that Vladimir Putin will agree to return the Kuriles to Japan, a step he
clearly hopes will reduce Russia’s international isolation and bring in needed
investment, has sparked anger across the Russian political spectrum and
threatens to further drive down his approval rating among Russians.
Indeed, returning the Kuriles,
however useful geopolitically, could drive down Putin’s approval rating within Russia
in much the same way his decision to raise the pension age did last year -- and
to do so from a much lower base which means that this could leave him with
vastly less popular support and thus drive him to seek other ways to boost his
approval.
There are few obvious opportunities
for that; and consequently, facing the prospect of declining support and increasing
protests by Russians as they connect the dots of his policies and link what he
is doing abroad to the declines in their own standard of living, Putin could adopt
an even more repressive approach, setting the stage for potentially violent
clashes.
Putin has only himself to blame. On
the one hand, he has made the defense of the territorial integrity of the
Russian Federation a key part of his political program; and so it should not
have been a surprise to him that Russians would reject returning the islands to
Japan all the more so because they were trophies from what they call “the Great
Patriotic War.”
And on the other, he has had the
opportunity to observe the problem in miniature when a deal Chechnya’s Ramzan
Kadyrov with Moscow’s backing forced on Ingushetia’s Yunus-Bek Yevkurov sparked
a month of protests that have grown to include demands that Yevkurov leave
office.
Three of what are a flood of
articles suggesting Putin may have already gone too far in talks with the
Japanese about the Kurile islands include the following: First, the LDPR has
introduced a draft bill in the Duma that would block any transfer without a referendum,
something the Kremlin might very well lose (mk.ru/politics/2019/01/10/v-gosdumu-vnesli-zakonoproekt-o-kurilskikh-ostrovakh.html).
Second, commentator Sergey Udaltsov
says picks up an argument Ingush opponents of the Yevkurov-Kadyrov accord have
made: “the fate of the Kuriles,” he says, “must be decided by the people and
not by Kremlin traders” who are willing to sacrifice the nation’s interests for
their own (svpressa.ru/blogs/article/221300/).
And third, Moscow political analyst
Aleksey Makarkin says bluntly what many Russians appear to be thinking: “The
people value the Kuriles more than the powers that be do;” and public opinion
will block any concessions Putin may be ready to make to Tokyo on the matter (rosbalt.ru/world/2019/01/10/1757072.html).
No comments:
Post a Comment