Paul
Goble
Staunton, April 22 – Up to now, most
Russian specialists make a distinction between traditional and untraditional
Islam on ideological grounds, with the former having deep historical roots in
Russia and subordinate to Muslim spiritual directorates (MSDs) and the latter
associated with radical ideas and existing outside of the mosques as an
underground phenomenon.
But that division, if ever correct,
has now broken down almost completely: the multiplication of MSDs means that
many radicals are part of one of these structures, and Muslims operating
separately from the mosques subordinate to these institutions are often as
traditional or more traditional than those that have official recognition.
A week ago, Naima Neflyasheeva, an
expert on Islam in the North Caucasus, hosted on an online presentation by
MGIMO expert Akhmed Yarlykapov followed by a discussion by experts in Russia
and abroad. Neflyasheva has now provided a summary of this event (kavkaz-uzel.eu/blogs/1927/posts/37484).
The muftiates, as the MSDs are often
referred to, “are finding it ever more difficult to control the situation on
their territories,” Yarlykapov says, not only because in many places there are
competing MSDs and influences from beyond the region but also because of the
rise of informal groups not registered with them.
It is critical to understand, he
continues, that “these informal networks do not necessarily consist of
so-called ‘non-traditional’ Muslims.” Many of them are ideologically the same
as the “traditional” ones in registered mosques, and the two trends cooperate
with each other on many issues, even where the non-traditional networks are
becoming dominant.
Irina Starodubrovskaya of Moscow’s
Gaidar Institute says she agrees with Yarlykapov on all this but adds that “’traditional’
and ‘non-traditional’ Islam are not only a conflict of identities but in large
measure reflects functional distinctions.” Official Islam is integrated
vertically while non-traditional is more horizontal and democratic. The
division isn’t always ideological.
Ziyautdin Uvaysov, a lawyer and
rights activist from Daghestan, says that the division people typically talk
about reflects the fact that the constitutional separation of church and state
doesn’t exist in practice and that officials are trying in every way “to keep
religious structures under their control.”
Many believers are alienated by that
control rather than by the religious position of the “traditional” and state-registered
MSDs and parishes, he says.
And Karena Avedissiyan of the American
University of Armenia says that “the choice between ‘traditional’ and ‘non-traditional’
Islam is not so much a question of doctrine as much as one between two methods
of expressing political identity.” Many Muslims choose non-traditional communities
in order to register their protest against the current regime.
The group then focused on the future
of “traditional” and “non-traditional” Islam.
Uvaysov suggested that the two would gradually converge except over the
issue of the relationship each has with the powers that be. Traditional Muslims
will accept the state as it is; non-traditional Muslims won’t.
Magomed Sunzhensky, in contrast,
says that “’unofficial’ Islam will become ever more ‘official,’” especially
since that is what its leaders and the official government establishment
want. Sometimes this can help overcome
conflicts or at least offer the opportunity for talks as has happened in
Ingushetia.
Yevgeny Ivanov, a graduate student
at Moscow’s Higher School of Economics, says the fate of the two branches will
depend on who can satisfy believers better. If official Islam continues to lose
this competition, he says, “then it risks consisting of pastors without flocks.
This question is not so much about hierarchy as about utility.”
And Magomed Magomedov, a Daghestani journalist, says that
in his republic the distinction between traditional and non-traditional is
increasingly being displaced by one between loyal and disloyal Muslims given
that there are official and unofficial Muslims in both of these categories.
No comments:
Post a Comment