Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 24 – Vladimir Putin has
declared that “certain former republics of the USSR received territorial gifts
from Russia” and that these “ungrateful subjects of the union” should have
returned them when they exercised their right to leave. (On the Kremlin leader’s
statement, see windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2020/06/putin-says-russia-gave-land-to.html.)
But the reality was just the
opposite: Ukraine and Belarus had far more of the territories on which their
titular nationalities lived handed over to the RSFSR than they received in
return, a fact that raises the question as to who gave what to whom and who
today is the ungrateful participant in such swaps.
That becomes obvious, Ukrainian
commentator Valentin Khokhlov says, if one compares the map of the dialects of
the Russian Empire that was prepared by the Imperial General Staff in 1914. (At
that time, Ukrainian and Belarusian were considered dialects of Russian, an
error only later corrected.) (kasparov.ru/material.php?id=5EF33B7A1AB49).
If one compares the areals of Russian,
Ukrainian and Belarusian speakers – and language in this case can stand as a
surrogate for identity – with the borders of the three union republics as
established at the start of Soviet times, the commentator says, one can see
that Russia was the recipient of territorial gifts not the source of them.
Indeed, one can say that “present-day
Russia (then the RSFSR) did not give anyone anything, at least in its European
part. On the contrary, it received from Ukraine truly tsar-like gifts –
Taganrog, Rostov-on-Don, the Kuban and part of Stavropol, Belgorod, and
Voronezh oblasts.”
“From Belarus, Russia received by the most
modest accounts, a large part of Smolensk and half of Bryansk Oblasts; and if
one is less modest, then it received all the lands to Kaluga and Bryansk plust
as a bonus in the form of Pskov Oblast.” At the same time, Belarus received
territory that was Ukrainian from Ukraine but not Belarusian from Russia.
That makes Putin’s claim truly absurd. “The
country which did not give anyone anything –the Russian Federation -- shouts
more loudly and aggressively than anyone else. It pays the republic which gave
it most of all – Ukraine – with black ingratitude.” And now Belarus another
gift giver to Russia is at risk as well.
Russia contrary to Putin thus turns out to
be not the chief gift giver to the other two but the most ungrateful of the
three despite receiving the most, Khokhlov concludes.
No comments:
Post a Comment