Paul
Goble
Staunton, June 20 – RBC sources tell
the news agency that the Russian government is backing away from a plan to
extend the limits of the Northern Sea Route lest it put Moscow in conflict with
foreign countries, a remarkable retreat given that the original plan to expand
was designed to allow Russia to meet Vladimir Putin’s projection of what that
route should cover.
Putin said last year that the Northern
Sea Route should see the amount of cargo carried double by 2024. The only way that
target could be met was to expand the area of the Northern Sea Route east and
west so that local trade could be counted within it, and officials made plans
to do that (windowoneurasia2.blogspot.com/2019/03/moscow-wont-meet-putin-targets-for.html).
Now, however, without fanfare, a
meeting last week chaired by Deputy Prime Minister Yury Trutnyev and including
representatives of the development, transportation, and foreign ministries and
Rosatom has decided not to lest it put Russia in violation of international law.
RBC says (rbc.ru/business/20/06/2020/5eecb19f9a7947cfd9e8abaf?from=from_main).
Based on Law of the Sea rules,
Russia will thus continue to define the Northern Sea Route as extending from the
Kars Gates to Cape Dezhnev in Chukotka and not including areas west and east of
that as Moscow had earlier suggested it would.
Rosatom reportedly was most opposed to the expansion.
What makes this latest decision
noteworthy is not only that it will mean Russia will not meet Putin’s stated
goal of 80 million tons of cargo on the Northern Sea Route by 2024 but also
that it shows that in this case the Russian government plans to live by the
rules at least in the Arctic where, given Putin’s exhortations, Moscow has been
making ever more extravagant claims.
Whether this is a turning point or a
one-off decision there or elsewhere remains to be seen, but until now, most
Russian commentator had acted as if the earlier decision to extend the length
of the Northern Sea Route was a done deal because of the need to meet Putin’s
plans.
No comments:
Post a Comment