Paul
Goble
Staunton, March 16 – For the last
year, the Kremlin has sent a clear message to the heads of federal subjects
that it expects them to get 70 percent of registered voters to the polls and
have 70 percent of those who do take part cast their ballots for Vladimir
Putin, the so-called “70/70” requirement.
But this week, just a few days
before Sunday’s vote, leaks from officials across the Russian Federation said
that the center had dropped that requirement, fearful that the demand for 70
percent participation would lead to the kind of massive falsifications that
could trigger demonstrations and protests (ura.news/articles/1036274235).
And while these reports did not
suggest that the Kremlin had other concerns, it seems extremely likely that
various recent reports showing that support for Putin has softened if not
slipped especially in major cities may have been a factor as well because
regional officials would have felt compelled to falsify those returns as well
if their futures depended upon them.
According to one regional official
with whom the URA news agency spoke, the Kremlin is now far more concerned
about the share of votes Putin receives than about the level of participation
and “the results of the work conducted will depend not on percentages but on
the number of votes for the main candidate.”
Ilya Grashenkov, the director of the
Center for the Development of Regional Politics, says that “in certain regions,
even a 65 percent participation rate will be difficult to achieve.” If
governors think they have to reach 70, they almost certainly will falsify the
result and that will cast a shadow on the legitimacy of the voting.
Another analyst, Gleb Kuznetsov of
the Expert Institute for Social Research, a group known to be close to the Kremlin,
says there is a recognition that “legitimacy is achieved only in honest
elections. Falsified votes will not be useful for society, for citizens nor for
those they choose.”
And a third, political analyst
Andrey Kolyadin, says that it will not be difficult for the governors to
achieve the new percentages especially because “there is every chance that the
first person will receive even more votes than he did in the last election.”
Meanwhile, an anonymous source close
to the Kremlin told URA that the Kremlin had adopted the 70-70 formula earlier
to divert opposition figure Aleksey Navalny into calling for a boycott. Navalny “took the bait,” the source said; and
instead of working together with other candidates like Grudinin, he pursued his
quixotic quest.
Had Navalny done otherwise, the
source continued, Navalny “really could have influenced the course of the entire
campaign.” It would have enlivened the opposition by suggesting the possibility
of a second round, although it was clear to everyone that Putin was going to
win and win more easily than that.
No comments:
Post a Comment